Are we allowed to provide valid SRC_URI for fetch restricted packages?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mike Frysinger <email@example.com> wrote:
> i don't see a problem here. *although this is something that you'd prob want
> to post to the trustees and let them make a decision.
This is a bit of a stale thread. This particular package was modified
to remove the SRC_URI, so it is no longer outstanding. The Trustees
have discussed, and i'd say a majority would prefer not to have
SRC_URI for fetch-restricted files. However, I don't believe we put
it to a vote.
Personally, I tend to not see an issue here, but am open-minded to
specific precedents/etc that raise concerns. I think others are a bit