On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:

scarabeus 12/02/20 15:57:31

Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt bug#405029.

(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64)

Revision Changes Path
1.2 dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
================================================== =================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000 1.1
+++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $

EAPI=4

@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@

DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README"

+MAKEOPTS="-j1"
+


Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get
respected?

El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> > scarabeus 12/02/20 15:57:31
> >
> > Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
> > Log:
> > Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt bug#405029.
> >
> > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> >
> > Revision Changes Path
> > 1.2 dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
> >
> > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup
> > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
> > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
> >
> > Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
> > ================================================== =================
> > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1
> > retrieving revision 1.2
> > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> > --- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000 1.1
> > +++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000 1.2
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $
> > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $
> >
> > EAPI=4
> >
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> >
> > DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README"
> >
> > +MAKEOPTS="-j1"
> > +
>
> Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get
> respected?
>
>
About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use "MAKEOPTS
+=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild) instead or it should
be avoided for some reason.

Thanks for the info

On 02/20/2012 09:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:

El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:

On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:

scarabeus 12/02/20 15:57:31

Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt bug#405029.

(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64)

Revision Changes Path
1.2 dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
================================================== =================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000 1.1
+++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $

EAPI=4

@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@

DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README"

+MAKEOPTS="-j1"
+


Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get
respected?



About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use "MAKEOPTS
+=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild) instead or it should
be avoided for some reason.

Thanks for the info



+= wasn't allowed because it isn't compatible with bash-3.1 (and
earlier) if I remember correctly


but that ship has long sailed and += syntax is used all over the tree
(and by the package manager itself!)


so feel free

- Samuli

>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:

>> About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use
>> "MAKEOPTS +=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild)
>> instead or it should be avoided for some reason.

> += wasn't allowed because it isn't compatible with bash-3.1 (and
> earlier) if I remember correctly

This is almost right: The += operator was introduced with bash 3.1,
so previously it couldn't be used in the tree because compatibility
with 3.0 was required.

> but that ship has long sailed and += syntax is used all over the
> tree (and by the package manager itself!)

> so feel free

It's "officially" allowed since more than two years ago:
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt>

Ulrich