Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook
Hi guys,
There's a small discussion going on on gentoo-doc [1] about documenting (or not documenting) advanced portage features in the Gentoo handbook. The suggestion currently is to have it as an added chapter in "Working with Portage" of which you can find a preview on [2] (don't mind the numbering). [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-doc/msg_f3c1439def8cd1df8b0f57fdbb7e6462.xml [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml The discussion however is if it is okay to document these things there or not. Some of the features are considered to be too "fragile" to be broadly documented (at least in a beginners resource like the Gentoo Handbook) and might cause eventual bugs to be closed as RESO:WONTFIX because the user used such a feature. Since you're the community at large for supporting stuff, we'd like to know if it is okay to document these things in the Gentoo Handbook (and if we need to put in specific warnings to ensure people don't abuse the functionality) or if you would rather not see it in. I personally don't think we cannot "not document" it. Eventually, the Gentoo WiKi will have it documented anyhow, and I already notice that many of the features are already used in #gentoo or gentoo-user@g.o. But there's still a difference between "not documenting" and putting it in the Gentoo Handbook. Thoughts? Suggestions? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen |
Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook
On 3.1.2012 19.51, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml > > The discussion however is if it is okay to document these things there or > not. Some of the features are considered to be too "fragile" to be broadly > documented (at least in a beginners resource like the Gentoo Handbook) and > might cause eventual bugs to be closed as RESO:WONTFIX because the user used > such a feature. > A quick read didn't seem like there would be something overly dangerous or support nightmare producing there. Regards, Petteri |
Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook
On 2012.01.03 17:51, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys, > > There's a small discussion going on on gentoo-doc [1] about > documenting (or > not documenting) advanced portage features in the Gentoo handbook. > The > suggestion currently is to have it as an added chapter in "Working > with > Portage" of which you can find a preview on [2] (don't mind the > numbering). > > [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-doc/ > msg_f3c1439def8cd1df8b0f57fdbb7e6462.xml > [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage- > advanced.xml > > The discussion however is if it is okay to document these things > there > or > not. [snip] > Thoughts? Suggestions? > > Wkr, > Sven Vermeulen > > Team, The Gentoo Handbook is about getting the base system installed. As such features such as per package CFLAGS have no place there. They are not within the scope of installing the base system. We already have separate guides for Xorg, Gnome, KDE, ALSA, binary blob video drivers and so on. I agree these portage features should be documented but probably in a 'bleeding edge' guide. Our users will tinker and break things just because they can anyway. At least don't give them the means to make them difficult to help in the introductory Gentoo text. -- Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods trustees |
Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:57:04PM +0000, Roy Bamford wrote:
> Team, > > The Gentoo Handbook is about getting the base system installed. > As such features such as per package CFLAGS have no place there. They > are not within the scope of installing the base system. I disagree. The first part is about getting a base system. The rest of the handbook is to describe the Gentoo-specific administrative stuff. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen |
Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512 On 01/03/2012 10:21 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:57:04PM +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: >> Team, >> >> The Gentoo Handbook is about getting the base system installed. >> As such features such as per package CFLAGS have no place there. >> They are not within the scope of installing the base system. > > I disagree. The first part is about getting a base system. The rest > of the handbook is to describe the Gentoo-specific administrative > stuff. > > Wkr, Sven Vermeulen > I agree. Advanced portage features can be in Gentoo Handbook provided it is clear that they should be not used without proper and complete understanding - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPA4PLAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC5pgQAIPKKkn4dYaEz/R+BCdobPlP 1DBEdmB4IGFwPJfmDup6ubVcNuCwarJ9OXIx+kTuBtar48G7bb HljmhD53qWhFy/ 7PeYmrNuwy05SDH0n3xm69Bf0ycCVgX/SiF5diV5S9K+v+HCrvP6YVSvsmBYOvbt mlxvqnU8pMg/OnOfSUck+rOzvkbGTWOf8zkWL3YQ8r7hKeAkG/fZj0iTjDzAXlqf Ng5SEHiNsHzE96psVH1IuCH1gEz1La+WUpeXKg2FBj1IVOhl1D UCCYqWd5zd8HHX /K8vh8OVsgv0Vv6X78Ugus9wXdUoYzODdrbne1dlwOP/3DK0mYG87p04sJCKzO8j RC1TU85eM54gMSRdP58MG/wqwi3yFmiURrmlhhS9yz4c2vlJ1J9iLehxUjPTzt7G ZgR6Xbbkk/ksiq6x/62vptvx/8zXN8/iRG32G9ESAJBrTmcwm8b3jrZYewKRkw/G I82tu+ubWsdA+bOqD+Qcd810ybElMhGNb7SB/YMtoCGtGSha4DX/Tli/q8kw81zQ tnb2vCKRe22p4s0D6F5hP5EKOHvEGx2TQtTvmUf+4hrO5033yP p/KZXM1IL7qfj6 2Ic7KMK2dmQavPJGsEG5O94Fjoh8F3djnPq2DaRR8pH37Rxh2U I83ZGfjrsJqWPM nmaPjNOxBMKTBc3BqjTY =5eW+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.