Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> said:
> Dne 4.11.2010 15:37, Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:33:59 +0000 (UTC), Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> >> scarabeus 10/11/04 14:33:59
> >>
> >> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-9999.ebuild
> >> quassel-0.7.1.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> Introduce logrotate useflag.
> >
> > Please remove the logrotate useflag, it should NOT be introduced.
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/198901 - "[TRACKER] Nuking logrotate use flag"
> >
> > -Jeremy
> You've got 3 years to get rid of that local useflag entirely, yet still
> 5 ebuilds use it.
> So do me a favor, remove it proactively if you really want to have it gone.

Please do remove the flag. The fact that there are some ebuilds in the
tree that use it does not make it alright to introduce more.

Thanks,

--
Mark Loeser
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://www.halcy0n.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 4.11.2010 18:40, Mark Loeser napsal(a):
> Please do remove the flag. The fact that there are some ebuilds in the
> tree that use it does not make it alright to introduce more.
>
> Thanks,
>
You should read cvs log first
I already did at the moment they reported it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzS8Y4ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcVowCfbLWQvR7mic Snv+v/NtFUCpQp
ngoAoKhNjIYT8uWgogSuwGcisuJSM+88
=692t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 11/4/10 6:40 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Please do remove the flag. The fact that there are some ebuilds in the
> tree that use it does not make it alright to introduce more.

Yeah, the "he's doing that too" bad excuse...

But there is a right point in that: why QA doesn't just commit fixes to
the ebuilds that misuse the logrotate flag?