Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +0000, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
> ssuominen 10/10/28 12:32:21
>
> Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
> Log:
> header
>
> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.7 net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild
>
> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&view=markup
> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&content-type=text/plain
> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>
> Index: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
> ================================================== =================
> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.6 2008/07/26 22:48:58 eva Exp $
> +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.7 2010/10/28 12:32:21 ssuominen Exp $
>
> inherit eutils

what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...


--
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo

On 10/28/2010 03:55 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +0000, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
> écrit :
>> ssuominen 10/10/28 12:32:21
>>
>> Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
>> Log:
>> header
>>
>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.7 net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild
>>
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&view=markup
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&content-type=text/plain
>> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>
>> Index: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
>> ================================================== =================
>> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v
>> retrieving revision 1.6
>> retrieving revision 1.7
>> diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
>> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
>> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
>> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
>> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>> -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.6 2008/07/26 22:48:58 eva Exp $
>> +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.7 2010/10/28 12:32:21 ssuominen Exp $
>>
>> inherit eutils
>
> what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...
>
>

kind of obvious, isn't it? someone edited the ebuild without updating
ebuild header to 2010, repoman bitched about it.

On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
> >> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
> >> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
[..]
> >> inherit eutils
> >
> > what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...
>
> kind of obvious, isn't it? someone edited the ebuild without updating
> ebuild header to 2010, repoman bitched about it.

Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there are
hundreds of such warnings in the tree.


A.

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:

Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there
are

hundreds of such warnings in the tree.


You mean thousands? There is no real reason to fix these repoman
"warnings" in the name of "qa" Upon commit of an actual worthwhile
change, the header will be updated automatically. No one needs to
manually update the header when they commit, I guess that wasn't the
case in the past because I see the blogtk header had an older date the
eva's last commit to it. meh, commit stats ftw!


% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
5449
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2008 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
2776
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
1471
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
592
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
313
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
38
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2003 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
0
% qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2002 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
0

On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>>> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
>>>> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
>>>> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
> [..]
>>>> inherit eutils
>>>
>>> what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...
>>
>> kind of obvious, isn't it? someone edited the ebuild without updating
>> ebuild header to 2010, repoman bitched about it.
>
> Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there are
> hundreds of such warnings in the tree.
>
>
> A.
>

That's why I take it category by category basis to keep my sanity. Fact
is there are none left in net-misc/ which can't be bad, can it?