El sáb, 02-10-2010 a las 21:36 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió:
> Hi, Pacho.
>
> В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> > Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is
> > conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to
> > bump f-spot to its 0.8 version. The problem is that eautoreconf doesn't
> > run, even running "autoreconf" on unpacked upstream sources fails with
> > the following error:
> > $ autoreconf
> > /usr/share/aclocal/sigc++.m4:8: warning: underquoted definition of
> > AM_PATH_SIGC
> > /usr/share/aclocal/sigc++.m4:8: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
> > /usr/share/aclocal/sigc++.m4:8: or see
> > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
> > help/Makefile.am:1: HAVE_GNOME_DOC_UTILS does not appear in
> > AM_CONDITIONAL
>
> $ cd f-spot-0.8.0
> $ grep -r HAVE_GNOME_DOC_UTILS . | grep m4
>
> will help you to see that this conditional is defined
> in ./build/m4/shamrock/gnome-doc.m4.
>
> > build/build.rules.mk:37: ENABLE_ATK does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
>
> this on is defined in ./build/m4/f-spot/gtk-sharp.m4. This problem can
> be fixed with correct include pathes:
>
> autoreconf -f -I build/m4/shamrock/ -I build/m4/f-spot/
>
> thus I think
>
> AT_M4DIR="-I build/m4/shamrock/ -I build/m4/f-spot/" eautoreconf
>
> should work.
>
> > I have already installed app-text/gnome-doc-utils-0.20.1, I have also
> > verified /usr/share/gnome-doc-utils/gnome-doc-utils.make is the same as
> > f-spot provided one, and that sources doesn't seem to be shipping any
> > gnome-doc-utils.m4 file
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your help and ideas :-)
>
> Thank you for taking care about this package! I really appreciate f-spot
> version bump
>
Thanks :-) I already bumped it following Samuli's suggestions for
running eautoreconf properly
Best regards
Help on f-spot-0.8 problem
