El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <email@example.com>
> > Hello
> > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
> > maintainer:
> > $ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
> > app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>firstname.lastname@example.org</email>
> > app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>email@example.com</email>
> > www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>firstname.lastname@example.org</email>
> > But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
> > retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
> > be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?
> > Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
> > some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.
> > Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)
> Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some
> packages" and
> shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her
> via direct email?
Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager
> that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and
> willing to fix what you break.
OK, sorry for the inconvenience (also to jlec, that has also replied to
this), I misinterpreted wormo retirement bug report
Thanks for your help