About wormo's situation?
 

Hello

I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
maintainer:
$ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>


But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?

Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.

Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)

About wormo's situation?
 

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
> maintainer:
> $ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
> app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
>
>
> But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
> retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
> be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?
>
> Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
> some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.
>
> Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)

Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some
packages" and
http://bugs.gentoo.org/custom_userhistory.cgi?matchstr=wormo@gentoo.org
shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her
via direct email? :) Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager
that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and
willing to fix what you break.

-Jeremy

About wormo's situation?
 

On 16/09/10 23:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
> maintainer:
> $ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
> app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
>
>
> But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
> retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
> be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?
>
> Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
> some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.
>
> Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)
>

Today I got a couple of bugs wrangled by her to me. So at least in
bugwrangling she is still active. And that constantly.

justin

About wormo's situation?
 

El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their
> > maintainer:
> > $ grep -r wormo */*/metada*
> > app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> > app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> > www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@gentoo.org</email>
> >
> >
> > But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she
> > retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages
> > be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)?
> >
> > Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about
> > some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-)
>
> Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some
> packages" and
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/custom_userhistory.cgi?matchstr=wormo@gentoo.org
> shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her
> via direct email? :) Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager
> that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and
> willing to fix what you break.
>
> -Jeremy
>
>

OK, sorry for the inconvenience (also to jlec, that has also replied to
this), I misinterpreted wormo retirement bug report

Thanks for your help