Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>:
> This won't work correctly for these three packages:
>
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs
> app-emulation/vmware-workstation
>
> because revdep-rebuild wants to emerge them repeatedly, since they're
> binary packages. How do I report this? Do I file one bug per
> package, or do I file only one for dev-libs/openssl where I list the
> three above packages?
Check first if they have been reported already, then look up the
maintainers from metadata.xml. If some have the same (and emul-linux-*
belongs to the same class) then do one bug for them.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
07-15-2010, 07:22 AM
Samuli Suominen
Should I file three bug reports or just one?
On 07/15/2010 07:36 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me:
>
> Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system.
> In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs,
> the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild
> in order to remove these old dependencies. If you do not have this
> helper program, simply emerge the 'gentoolkit' package.
>
> # revdep-rebuild --library libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> # revdep-rebuild --library libssl.so.0.9.8
>
> This won't work correctly for these three packages:
>
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs
One for needed for amd64 to update emul- sets, and I guess this depends
on bug 328355 being handled first.