Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On 06/02/10 09:18, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Here's a bunch of packages up for grabs, due to maintainers retiring..
>
> maintainer-needed
> -----------------
> app-admin/monit
> app-forensics/samhain
> app-misc/anki
> app-misc/beanstalkd
> dev-libs/vanessa-adt
> dev-libs/vanessa-logger
> net-libs/vanessa-mcast
> net-libs/vanessa-socket
>
I'll assimilate those
06-02-2010, 05:59 PM
Hans de Graaff
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:18 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
> app-misc/sphinx
I'll take this.
> dev-ruby/IceRuby
I've added this to the ruby herd.
Hans
06-03-2010, 06:16 PM
Tobias Scherbaum
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Torsten Veller:
> net-analyzer/nagios-check_logfiles
> net-analyzer/nagircbot
> net-analyzer/pnp4nagios
I am not an ebuild developer, I belong to the Spanish
translation team (to which I joined recently). One of
our former leads (yoswink) maintained this package, it
is a pity to abandon it.
I would like to maintain gentoo packages in the future,
so I think this is a good start point.
Currently I am reading the Developers Guide, to know
how the gentoo stuff works.
Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
I have to do?.
Thanks.
06-08-2010, 04:25 PM
Jeroen Roovers
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
José María Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
>
> > app-doc/repodoc
> Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
> I have to do?.
You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four
outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on
those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course.
Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too.
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> José María Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
> >
> > > app-doc/repodoc
>
> > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
> > I have to do?.
>
> You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four
> outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on
> those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course.
> Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too.
>
>
> Regards,
> jer
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc
>
Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction.
I'll begin to work in those bugs.
Cheers.
06-09-2010, 07:40 PM
Victor Ostorga
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:59:11 +0200
José María Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> > José María Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
> > >
> > > > app-doc/repodoc
> >
> > > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
> > > I have to do?.
> >
> > You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four
> > outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves
> > on those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of
> > course. Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc
> >
>
> Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction.
> I'll begin to work in those bugs.
>
I can be your proxy commmiter for this one, perhaps a starting
point is to update the home page[2] of this package; actually I don't
know if it is still developed.
Ping me when you have some news
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/repodoc/
Regards,
--
Víctor Ostorga
Gentoo Linux developer (lxde, treecleaners)
http://www.gentoo.org
06-11-2010, 08:53 PM
Maciej Mrozowski
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Friday 11 of June 2010 21:26:06 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 11 June 2010 21:12, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else
> > to look after them:
> >
> > media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump)
> > media-video/smplayer - qt and video herds
> > x11-themes/haematite-xcursors - desktop-misc herd
> > x11-themes/obsidian-xcursors - ,,
> > x11-themes/pearlgrey-xcursors - ,,
> > x11-wm/openbox - hwoarang?, lxde herd, desktop-wm herd
> > app-misc/vifm <-- this is now maintainer-needed!
> > app-text/wgetpaste <-- this is now maintainer-needed!
> >
> > Also, my proxy-maintainers will need new contacts:
> > x11-wm/echinus - anyone from desktop-wm still active?
> > dev-php/roadsend-php - anyone from php?
> >
> > I hope I didn't forget anything.
>
> I forgot to add:
>
> app-text/poppler - reavertm?, now assigned to kde herd, and printing
> herd which is basically dead
Yeah, kde herd is on it.
> app-text/poppler-data - assigned to dead printing herd and loki_val
> who is on extended devaway
We can also assimilate this one if needed.
--
regards
MM
06-12-2010, 12:09 PM
Alex Alexander
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:50:38PM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote:
> I guess I should have done a proper grep on the tree before my first
> message. I missed a few more that are now up for grabs:
app-misc/vifm
media-sound/ncmpcpp
net-misc/wput
^^ I'll take these
media-video/smplayer
^^ The Qt team will take care of this. I might add myself as a
maintainter to give it some extra attention, we'll see.
--
Alex Alexander :: wired
Gentoo Developer
www.linuxized.com
06-18-2010, 04:42 PM
José María Alonso
Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:29:01PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> 2010/6/8 José María <nimiux@gentoo.org>
>
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> > > José María Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
> > > >
> > > > > app-doc/repodoc
> > >
> > > > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
> > > > I have to do?.
> > >
> > > You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four
> > > outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on
> > > those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course.
> > > Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > jer
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc
> > >
> >
> > Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction.
> > I'll begin to work in those bugs.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Ok, then I won't mask this package for removal ( I was about to do it right
> now when I accidentally remembered this thread ) for now. If the bugs are
> still unresolved after 30 days I will have to mask it for removal. In the
> meantime, if you have working patches for the repodoc bugs [1], I can commit
> them for you and proxy this package for you until you gain tree access
>
> [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc
Thank you for your help in trying to get the app-doc/repodoc package
back to live :-)
I've found some information on this package:
1. I've contacted Fernando Pereda (ferdy), one of the authors of
repodoc. He told me (as expected) that this package is no longer
maintained. He recommends to find out if the translatos are
currently using this package (seems very reasonable).
Besides, the package is not very secure, since it allows to run
commands by using a specially modify doc.
It is slow and the technologies used (bash and sed) are not the
proper ones to manage XML.
2. I've pinged the gentoo-translators maillist [1] to find
translators who are using this package. I've got only one
negative answer in a week or so.
3. I've taken a look at the package's unresolved bugs:
197617 - Seems tough to fix, according to yoswink and neysx
comments.
297946 - I've posted a comment [2] in this bug. No answer at
the moment.
297947 - Haven't check yet.
299753 - Seems easy to fix.