media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
> problem by renaming it.
No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.
It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the
(unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the
$summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for.
Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org>
> Date: 27 May 2010 10:44
> Subject: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by
> preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
> To: yngwin@gentoo.org
>
>
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>
> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
>
>
> ssuominen@gentoo.org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Summary|media-libs/libpng-1.4.2 |media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2
> |update not handled by |update not handled by
> |preserved-libs due to |preserved-libs due to
> |uninstall of older SLOT |uninstall of older SLOT
>
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
|
