Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
 

# Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
# Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
# stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
# Removal in 30 days
net-dns/ldapdns

Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
 

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:

>
> # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> # Removal in 30 days
> net-dns/ldapdns
>

So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.

Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?

Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
 

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > # Removal in 30 days
> > net-dns/ldapdns
> >
>
> So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
>
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.

> Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?

Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
if it is still functional.

[1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

Regards,

Víctor

Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
 

Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
>
> Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
> >
> > Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009)
> > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
> > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
> > > # Removal in 30 days
> > > net-dns/ldapdns
> >
> > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
> > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
>
> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
>
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
> if it is still functional.
>
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
>
and also powerdns
has ldap support
the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree
both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences

Mario

Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
 

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:47:51 -0600
Victor Ostorga <vostorga@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
>
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
> if it is still functional.
>
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

Well, without documentation on how to use it, we can't do anything, so I just removed the LDAP DNS guide entirely. RESO FIXED from the GDP.