> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst)
> > wrote:
> >> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
> >> Modified: ChangeLog
> >> Added: reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
> >> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
> >> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> > ...
> >> 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
> >> plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> > instead of files/?
> Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not
> something I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it
> uncommitted easily.
Then put it in an overlay or something?
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662