FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-03-2008, 10:23 AM
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)"
 
Default gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
>> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog
>> Added: reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
>> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
>> Log:
>> add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
>> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> ...
>> 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> instead of files/?
>

Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not something
I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it uncommitted easily.

Marijn

- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhsqIUACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xnGwCgwy1QiSruuSFBLHgw4aMHvMCD
gjwAn0oi7WAoTozSdprszabKgLmlugBJ
=Ywad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
 
Old 07-03-2008, 05:33 PM
Ryan Hill
 
Default gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:23:01 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst)
> > wrote:
> >> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
> >>
> >> Modified: ChangeLog
> >> Added: reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
> >> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
> >> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> > ...
> >> 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
> >> plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> > instead of files/?
> >
>
> Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not
> something I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it
> uncommitted easily.

Then put it in an overlay or something?


--
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:44 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org