On 19:03 Thu 12 Jun , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:14:21 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 04:11 Wed 11 Jun , Brian Harring wrote:
> > > > Reiterating the early request, I'd like the council to please
> > > > discuss the current status of PMS,
> > >
> > > People actually working on the PMS would be better-placed to
> > > discuss its current status, if by that you mean progress toward an
> > > approved spec. The last I heard was a couple months ago when Ciaran
> > > asked us whether there were any further major issues and removed
> > > kdebuild-1 from the PDF to be approved.
> > he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to
> > happen
> No, I was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the version sent to the
> Council for approval. Doing so is just a case of toggling a switch in
> Also, until they were all mysteriously fired, Gentoo's KDE people were
> planning to ask the Council for official approval of kdebuild-1 so that
> it could remain in PMS. So that's still up in the air too.
All? Only one person I know of, Philantrop. Were rbrown or spb
committing much to KDE stuff?
> > > I'd like to know what's holding you back from contributing to it,
> > > instead of telling us that someone else is doing things you don't
> > > like. Is there some kind of technical barrier (like the TeX)? Or
> > > what? Are you filing bugs against the parts you don't like? What's
> > > happening to them?
> > TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert
> > it to docbook and be done with this garbage.
> And docbook does integrate with Gentoo? Please point me to other Gentoo
> documentation that uses docbook.