Gentoo Qt team meeting, 25 March 2011
 

Place: #gentoo-meetings
Date: 25 March 2011
Time: 1300 UTC
Topics: https://gitorious.org/gentoo-qt/pages/Meeting20120325


Sun Mar 11 17:30:02 2012
Return-path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-50162-tom=linux-archive.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:57 +0200
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80]:33697 helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50162-tom=linux-archive.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S6kWz-0001to-Ho
for tom@linux-archive.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:57 +0200
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52AF8E08AC;
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:17:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Delivered-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595B3E0877
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (hnvr-4dbd5126.pool.mediaWays.net [77.189.81.38])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: chithanh)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5912364776
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F5CC159.1020602@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:14:33 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?=
<chithanh@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120309 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1?
References: <1331467306.11661.2.camel@belkin4> <4F5CA874.6070209@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nRgRTKh=Ks916kbtjsAkFWjZjbOyjtdXAxm97AKHrL dQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120311135503.707de3b6@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120311135503.707de3b6@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
>> Is there really much of a benefit to this? I guess for anybody who
>> runs scripts to mass-manipulate ebuilds it might be helpful, but I
>> think all the package managers planned on supporting all the EAPIs for
>> quite a while longer.
> We have to support them indefinitely. It's not possible to uninstall a
> package whose EAPI is unknown.
>

Would it be feasible to do a pkg_pretend() check and refuse
install/upgrade if packages with unsupported EAPI are detected?


Best regards,
Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n

Gentoo Qt team meeting, 25 March 2011
 

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Place: #gentoo-meetings
> Date: 25 March 2011
> Time: 1300 UTC
> Topics: https://gitorious.org/gentoo-qt/pages/Meeting20120325

Topic is wrong, the meeting is obviously in 2012 :D