FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo Catalyst

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-03-2011, 11:28 PM
Sebastian Pipping
 
Default Migrating man page to asciidoc?

On 06/27/2011 05:55 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 05:58 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases.
>> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..]
>
> To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all.
> In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that
> branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2.
>
> I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. It doesn't have to be a
> quick decision. Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed.
>
> Ideas on find out who is using 9999:
>
> - Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining
>
> - Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing
> the possible death of that thread and a request to join
> this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need.
>
> - Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums,
> planet gentoo.
>
> After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people
> a chance to react.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't
>> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official
>> ones we use to build weekly releases.
>
> That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for
> real to me.

One week has passed by. Anyone?



Sebastian
 
Old 07-04-2011, 12:10 AM
Matt Turner
 
Default Migrating man page to asciidoc?

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 05:55 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> On 06/27/2011 05:58 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases.
>>> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..]
>>
>> To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all.
>> In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that
>> branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2.
>>
>> I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. *It doesn't have to be a
>> quick decision. *Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed.
>>
>> Ideas on find out who is using 9999:
>>
>> *- Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining
>>
>> *- Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing
>> * *the possible death of that thread and a request to join
>> * *this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need.
>>
>> *- Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums,
>> * *planet gentoo.
>>
>> After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people
>> a chance to react.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>>> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't
>>> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official
>>> ones we use to build weekly releases.
>>
>> That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for
>> real to me.
>
> One week has passed by. *Anyone?

I'm perfectly fine with the change, especially after the graphviz
dependency of asciidoc was made optional.

Matt
 
Old 07-04-2011, 12:18 AM
Sebastian Pipping
 
Default Migrating man page to asciidoc?

On 07/04/2011 02:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>>> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases.
>>>> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..]
>>>
>>> To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all.
>>> In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that
>>> branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2.
>>>
>>> I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. It doesn't have to be a
>>> quick decision. Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed.
>>>
>>> Ideas on find out who is using 9999:
>>>
>>> - Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining
>>>
>>> - Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing
>>> the possible death of that thread and a request to join
>>> this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need.
>>>
>>> - Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums,
>>> planet gentoo.
>>>
>>> After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people
>>> a chance to react.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>>> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't
>>>> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official
>>>> ones we use to build weekly releases.
>>>
>>> That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for
>>> real to me.
>>
>> One week has passed by. Anyone?
>
> I'm perfectly fine with the change, especially after the graphviz
> dependency of asciidoc was made optional.

Please re-read the text above. It's not about asciidoc.
I'll make a new thread.

Best,



Sebastian
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org