Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Derek Fedel wrote:
Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines,
but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the
ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now
seemingly inane question.
please fix your quoting ... top posting is the devil
I concur :P
On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Derek Fedel wrote:
I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
portage, and this as my spec file:
How many times do we have to say this? :P
If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set
of stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely
avoid the various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
is there a catalyst/stages FAQ ? if not, there should be ...
Are you volunteering?
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
email@example.com mailing list