On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 21:15 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On 17-03-2008 22:29:18 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > O.k,
> >
> > I've been using prefix portage 9380 for a while, and I've just upgraded
> > to 9468 and now in pym/__init__.py there's a requirement for os.statvfs
> > which the system I'm using doesn't currently have, and so portage
> > bailed.
>
> Can you try the attached patch. If that doesn't work, can you post the
> exact backtrace/error message?

Yep, that works.

Alan.

--
gentoo-alt@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

On 24-03-2008 10:40:38 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 21:15 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > On 17-03-2008 22:29:18 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > O.k,
> > >
> > > I've been using prefix portage 9380 for a while, and I've just upgraded
> > > to 9468 and now in pym/__init__.py there's a requirement for os.statvfs
> > > which the system I'm using doesn't currently have, and so portage
> > > bailed.
> >
> > Can you try the attached patch. If that doesn't work, can you post the
> > exact backtrace/error message?
>
> Yep, that works.

Thanks, it's included in 9500


--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
gentoo-alt@lists.gentoo.org mailing list