09.11.2010, 11:59, "Fabian Groffen" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On 09-11-2010 10:42:41 +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> *07.11.2010, 18:51, "Konstantin Tokarev" <email@example.com>;:
>>> *Hi all,
>>> *It seems to me like many packages working on ppc-macos are not keyworded
>>> *But package working on ppc and x86-macos or x86_64-macos is likely to be
>>> *working for ppc-macos (also, package working for x86 and ppc-macos will work
>>> *on x86-macos, and so on)
>>> *Maybe it's worth to add special mode to portage-prefix accepting such keyword
>>> *combinations (e.g., when some option is specified in emerge command line)?
>> *Also, I suppose ppc64-macos = ppc64 && X-macos (X - some other arch). It would
>> *be useful for those who tries ppc64-macos prefix because too few packages are
> actually none are keyworded ppc64-macos.
> It is not safe to assume that what compiles on ppc(-linux) also compiles
> on ppc-macos. *While it is likely that *-macos all or none compile, it
> is also best to first verify that, before assuming it is.
Hmm, I hoped that most of *-macos should at least compile
(I didn't explore very many packages, but most of ~ppc-macos do compile)