On 06/06/2010 12:43 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Current situation is to mask packages that run as root. I'm seriously
considering to lift this restriction because:
1) We aren't very good at keeping this list up2date.
2) It poses artificial restrictions for some users and doens't harm the
3) Why bother to mask them?
running as root still works ? i suppose ther could be the case where
root could have a prefix ?
The thread should really be called "packages that need root privs to
run" and we have now had enough feedback that I am moving forward this
week on it.