FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-29-2008, 12:05 PM
das
 
Default SCIM and other Problem in XFCE in FC9 -SOLVED

The problem of not being able to make SCIM work in XFCE-Fedora 9 is
solved. The Bugzilla entry was:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411

God knows why they changed the title of this entry from 'SCIM not
working in XFCE in F9' to a very obtuse an unrepresentative 'No hotkeys
defined for non-Asian locales'. Read it to understand why the change of
title is so comprehensively meaningless. I presume some workload
distribution problem internal to Redhat office is there behind this
renaming. Anyway the content is there for anyone.

And also a Fedora Guide Page:

http://fedoraguide.info/index.php/Scim_xfce

I just now created it because in reference to this thread two different
friends mailed me about the solution. I have never before written any
Fedora Guide wiki page, so I don't know the technical specifications,
and I am in a hurry to read in details. So, even if that is not there
for not being up to the standard, the bugzilla entry will be for anyone
who wants to make SCIM work in XFCE in Fedora 9.

--
das
ddts.randomink.org

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 
Old 05-30-2008, 11:51 AM
"Bill Crawford"
 
Default SCIM and other Problem in XFCE in FC9 -SOLVED

2008/5/29 das <dasd.here@gmail.com>:
> The problem of not being able to make SCIM work in XFCE-Fedora 9 is
> solved. The Bugzilla entry was:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411
>
> God knows why they changed the title of this entry from 'SCIM not
> working in XFCE in F9' to a very obtuse an unrepresentative 'No hotkeys
> defined for non-Asian locales'. Read it to understand why the change of
> title is so comprehensively meaningless. I presume some workload
> distribution problem internal to Redhat office is there behind this
> renaming. Anyway the content is there for anyone.

Just because you're pissed off it took a long time to solve doesn't
make you right. I've read all that, and yes, the title is accurate;
it's a bit more specific than "it doesn't work" which appears to be
what you want.

If bugzilla titles were required to be vague, we'd all have trouble
finding things. And for developers, it helps to have an accurate
statement of a problem. You can't legislate against that, and expect
them to carry on helping you.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org