FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-28-2008, 07:05 PM
"Paulo Roncon"
 
Default rsync mirror for FC9

Where's the mirror to livna to do na rsync in FC9?
Can anybody help?

Thanks!


Paulo
CSO2

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@redhat.com
Sent: quarta-feira, 28 de Maio de 2008 20:03
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 231

Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: PGP signatures. (Anne Wilson)
2. Re: PGP signatures. (Todd Zullinger)
3. F9 and NetworkManager? (Knute Johnson)
4. Re: F9 and NetworkManager? (Mike Chambers)
5. Re: F9 KDE4 - CMake Error: Error in cmake code at (Kevin Kofler)
6. Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05 (Srikanth Konjarla)
7. Has OpenBSD's spamd been ported to Linux? (Raymond C. Rodgers)
8. Re: Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05 (Endy)
9. Re: Fedora 9 + Network Manager = Wireless NOT Connecting
(Olusola Fadero)
10. Re: F9 and NetworkManager? (Knute Johnson)
11. Re: F9 - Install a Font (Ric Moore)
12. Re: F9 - Install a Font (Ric Moore)
13. Re: F9 - Install a Font (Ric Moore)
14. Re: Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05 (Christopher A. Williams)
15. Re: PGP signatures. (Patrick)
16. OpenJDK not in alternatives after F8-F9 upgrade (Chris Bredesen)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 18:01:35 +0100
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: PGP signatures.
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200805281801.35747.cannewilson@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:07:59 Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
> > 2008/5/28 Mike Chambers <mike@miketc.com>:
> >> What is mean by "name"? Guess I am clueless to gpg and don't know my
> >> way around it (viewing man gpg at the moment) and nto sure what to do
> >> for example, when like someone's signature says invalid from evo on an
> >> email to the list?
> >
> > It's usually the email address listed as the "user id" for the key (or
> > subkey).
> >
> > I find it easiest to do this via kgpg, actually - you just right click
> > and choose "Sign keys" from the menu.
>
> While you could use the person's name, you can run into more then
> one key for a person, with different email addresses.
>
> For example, I have keys for both my infinity-ltd.com address, and
> my old execpc.com email address. I probably should revoke the
> execpc.com address, but there are still some RPMs floating around
> signed with that key. Besides, I don't remember where I stored the
> private key for that one.
>
kgpg handles all that seamlessly. I have several people on my keyring that
have more than one key.

It's also possible to have one key for several addresses, as I do. For those
that use kgpg, just take a look at my key. It lists several addresses and is
signed by a number of people - yes, they did see my passport :-). Similarly,

gpg --list-keys 1E1C9C17

shows all the identities that my key can be used for.

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080528/b8a856f5/attachment.bin

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:06:42 -0400
From: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: PGP signatures.
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <20080528170642.GH2769@inocybe.teonanacatl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 08:04 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> Ok, I agree with your analysis. It can't be ruled as invalid if had
>> not been retrieved. But I am ignorant. I do not know how to do the
>> signing
>
> gpg --sign-key <name>

Bzzt! Don't do that. Not unless you have:

1) Verified the details of the key (fingerprint, size, and type,
at least)

2) Verified the email address used (perhaps via a simple challenge
email asking the key holder to sign some data of your choosing and
return it to you)

3) Done some sort of validation that the name on the key is really
the name the key holder is known as

There is nothing to be gained by just signing a key to make the
"invalid" warning go away. And in fact, it can be harmful. If you
use --sign-key and then even send that key to someone else or to a
keyserver, others may take your signature to mean that you've done
some or all of the verification I mentioned above. If you haven't,
you're harming your reputation, as no one wants to trust the
signature from someone that doesn't do any verification. (Think of
signing a key as you would notarizing a document. You wouldn't stamp
your seal on something without some checking.)

If you really must silence the warning (and I would argue that there
is no point in that), you can use gpg --lsign-key to create a local
signature. Such a signature will not ever be exported.

--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080528/14ae288e/attachment.bin

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 10:07:54 -0700
From: Knute Johnson <linux@www.knutejohnson.com>
Subject: F9 and NetworkManager?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483D916A.3070003@www.knutejohnson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I installed F9 on an old computer that only has 256M of RAM. I did a
text mode install and it worked fine. One interesting thing is that if
you do a text mode install, gdm is apparently not installed. Anyway,
when I start up X, the NetworkManager is running but it doesn't enable
my wired connection. I've played around with the menus and put in the
MAC address but that had no effect. I'm sure I'm missing something
simple but I need a hint.

Thanks,

--

Knute Johnson
linux@www.knutejohnson.com



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:16:28 -0500
From: Mike Chambers <mike@miketc.com>
Subject: Re: F9 and NetworkManager?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1211994988.10987.7.camel@scrappy.miketc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 10:07 -0700, Knute Johnson wrote:
> I installed F9 on an old computer that only has 256M of RAM. I did a
> text mode install and it worked fine. One interesting thing is that if
> you do a text mode install, gdm is apparently not installed. Anyway,
> when I start up X, the NetworkManager is running but it doesn't enable
> my wired connection. I've played around with the menus and put in the
> MAC address but that had no effect. I'm sure I'm missing something
> simple but I need a hint.

Try running system-config-network and configure your connection there
initially, and save. Just don't start the network service. Once it's
saved (you may need to reboot) you can try restarting/redoing NM to see
if it sees it then. You also need to check the "let NM control it" box
as well.

--
Mike Chambers
Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
mikec302@fedoraproject.org



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@chello.at>
Subject: Re: F9 KDE4 - CMake Error: Error in cmake code at
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <loom.20080528T171503-534@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

dexter <dex.mbox <at> googlemail.com> writes:
> On Tue May 27 2008 06:30:21 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > That's part of KDE 4.1, and presumably requires KDE 4.1 to build now. Try
> > an older version for now.
>
> A kde development environment that looks backwards is useless to me YMMV.

We're shipping the latest stable version of KDE, KDE 4.0.4. Of course we aren't
shipping unstable betas or even alphas of KDE in a stable release! KDE 4.1 is
not released yet.

Kevin Kofler



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 10:24:28 -0700
From: Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@gmail.com>
Subject: Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05
To: Fedora List <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483D954C.6010803@Gmail.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=113919

Does this mean that it would work with Fedora 9 without having to
backout to older version of Xorg?

Thanks

Srikanth



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:33:27 -0400
From: "Raymond C. Rodgers" <sinful622@gmail.com>
Subject: Has OpenBSD's spamd been ported to Linux?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483D9767.2010103@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

While I know there are lots of anti-spam utilities out there, I've found
OpenBSD's spamd (spam deferral daemon) to be quite useful, and now that
I'm managing the Linux servers for my company and the amount of spam and
bounce-back spam we've received today, I thought I'd inquire as to
whether or not it had been ported to Linux.

Does anyone know if it has been, and if it has, where I might find it?

Thank you,
Raymond



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:04:09 -0700
From: Endy <endy@digitalgrotto.net>
Subject: Re: Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483D9E99.2020701@digitalgrotto.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Srikanth Konjarla wrote:
> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=113919
>
> Does this mean that it would work with Fedora 9 without having to
> backout to older version of Xorg?
>
> Thanks
>
> Srikanth
>
Yes, I just got it running on my machine without any problems. glxgears
is a little bit slower than on earlier drivers, but it is a beta.



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:16:26 -0700
From: "Olusola Fadero" <olusola.fadero@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fedora 9 + Network Manager = Wireless NOT Connecting
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<d859c0af0805281116t349d5084x6c7b56f2ec99e716@mail .gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

What wireless card do you have in your laptop?

Olusola

>
>
> *I would like to know if anyone is having problems getting their wireless
> connection to actually connect in Fedora 9 using Network Manager?*
>
> I just installed Fedora 9 on my laptop (Thinkpad R40). I did not do the 76
> updates yet, but out-of-the-box, my wireless won't connect. The LAN
> connects just fine, but not wireless. It's great that network manager does
> an auto broadcast, now. I put in my WEP information, which I
> triple-checked, but it says the connection has disconnected. I even tried
> it on WEPless access points and the same thing happens.
>
>
> --
> Marc F.
>
> "..Grace to you and peace from Him who is and who was and who is to come.."
> -Rev1:4
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080528/e58cdfa5/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:26:02 -0700
From: Knute Johnson <linux@www.knutejohnson.com>
Subject: Re: F9 and NetworkManager?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483DA3BA.90508@www.knutejohnson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 10:07 -0700, Knute Johnson wrote:
>> I installed F9 on an old computer that only has 256M of RAM. I did a
>> text mode install and it worked fine. One interesting thing is that if
>> you do a text mode install, gdm is apparently not installed. Anyway,
>> when I start up X, the NetworkManager is running but it doesn't enable
>> my wired connection. I've played around with the menus and put in the
>> MAC address but that had no effect. I'm sure I'm missing something
>> simple but I need a hint.
>
> Try running system-config-network and configure your connection there
> initially, and save. Just don't start the network service. Once it's
> saved (you may need to reboot) you can try restarting/redoing NM to see
> if it sees it then. You also need to check the "let NM control it" box
> as well.
>

I don't know why but after doing system-config-network it works fine. I
didn't change anything but it works.

Thanks,

--

Knute Johnson
linux@www.knutejohnson.com



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:37:23 -0400
From: Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: F9 - Install a Font
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1211999843.13982.12.camel@iam.wayward4now.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:45 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 27.05.2008 16:40, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit :
> | On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 14:16 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> |> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 07:32 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> |>> I've found numerous guides to installing all of the MS core fonts via a
> |>> spec file in F9, but how do I install a single TTF font in Fedora 9?
> |>> System -> Preferences -> Look and Feel -> Appearances shows me
> available
> |>> fonts, but I can't find a tool to add a font.
> |> In Fedora 8 it was like this:
> |>
> |> System->Preferences->Look and Feel->Appearance
> |> Fonts->Details...->Go to Fonts Folder
> |>
> |> I would love to know how this is meant to work in Fedora 9 now that the
> |> 'Go to Fonts Folder' button has disappeared...
> |
> | I don't know the answer, but remember that in F9 no longer uses xfs, so
> | that may change things.
>
> In f8 (and I believe in f9) fonts work without any problems and
> "dynamically" with font-config.
>
> Put your fonts in ~/.fonts and it is done. You can check the result
> using fc-list
>
> For a system wide use, create a directory:
>
> /usr/local/share/fonts/
>
> then add the fonts there (in their own directory if you want to make a
> classification).
>
> To have these fonts used by the system, create a local.conf file in
> /etc/fonts
>
> <----local.conf
>
> <fontconfig>
> ~ <!-- Font directory list -->
> ~ <dir>/usr/local/share/fonts</dir>
> </fontconfig>
>
> <--- end local.conf

In my Xvfb thread, what the heck is /etc/X11/fontpath.d for?? And, how
is it initted/created and what should be in it? Is it a file or a
directory? I'm finding nuttin' googling my rear-end off. How 'bout it
Rahul?? Inquiring minds really need to know, so Xvfb works.

Or, would a local.conf file, as suggested here, override the mysterious
fontpath.d whateveritis?? I sure need to fix this one for my project
using Xvbf in Java Wonderland so we get our "proof-of-concept" before
the interested parties. Thanx, Ric

--
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too
================================================



------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:38:07 -0400
From: Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: F9 - Install a Font
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1211999887.13982.14.camel@iam.wayward4now.net>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:06 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:09:23 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Michael C wrote:
> > > This thread reminds me of an unpleasant bug in the KDE Control Center
> > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251286) which hosed the
> > > X-server for anyone attempting to install fonts "system wide" by
> > > selecting Administrator Mode.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > I only mention this because, despite the fact that it continues to
> > > persist in F8, with it being originally filed as arising in F7 the bug's
> > > set to be "officially" closed on June 13.
> >
> > Closed only because no one bothered to confirm whether the bug still exists
> > yet or not.
> >
> It must be very depressing to see the huge number of bugs that stick on a
> NEEDINFO ticket for years, with no-one bothering to follow them up.

Hugely, Anne. Hugely. Ric

--
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too
================================================



------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:42:43 -0400
From: Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: F9 - Install a Font
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1212000163.13982.20.camel@iam.wayward4now.net>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:09:23 Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> >> > I only mention this because, despite the fact that it continues to
> >> > persist in F8, with it being originally filed as arising in F7 the
> >> > bug's set to be "officially" closed on June 13.
> >>
> >> Closed only because no one bothered to confirm whether the bug still
> >> exists yet or not.
> >>
> > It must be very depressing to see the huge number of bugs that stick on a
> > NEEDINFO ticket for years, with no-one bothering to follow them up.
>
> Shrug, folks are busy, I think we can all understand that. In a perfect
> world all bugs would be fixed, and everyone would get a magical
> fedora-branded pony.
>
> My take as packager, is that if a bug isn't important enough for followup
> (esp after NEEDINFO) or to be reported (properly), then it's not important
> enough to take the time/effort to look at and fix. I try to focus on the
> stuff that folks care about the most, where I see/hear the most (hopefully)
> constructive feedback. hrm... I feel a blog coming on...

Rex, the other shoe on that pony, as has been debated before, is that a
lot of us would prefer to ask the list first, just so we're not creating
something <*>--STUPID--<*> on the bug list.

I'm sure the guys that have to answer those tickets would rather we make
sure that we've TRIED to become informed on the problems first, then to
make an intelligent as well as useful submission to bugzilla after. Or,
we could just put the list to bed and file every problem to bugzilla to
wait months for the result. That's my take on it. Ric

--
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too
================================================



------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:43:44 -0600
From: "Christopher A. Williams" <chriswfedora@cawllc.com>
Subject: Re: Updated NVIDIA Driver 173.14.05
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1212000225.24780.22.camel@spikehome.spikenet.loca l>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:04 -0700, Endy wrote:
> Srikanth Konjarla wrote:
> > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=113919
> >
> > Does this mean that it would work with Fedora 9 without having to
> > backout to older version of Xorg?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Srikanth
> >
> Yes, I just got it running on my machine without any problems. glxgears
> is a little bit slower than on earlier drivers, but it is a beta.

Good news indeed! I think I will still wait - for the sake of
convenience - until Livna catches up with their packages.

Nice to know someone got the rock to at least budge a little...

Cheers,

Chris

--
===========================
"If you are calm while all around you is chaos,
then you probably haven't fully understood
the magnitude of the situation."

--Unknown



------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:54:50 +0200
From: Patrick <fedora-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: PGP signatures.
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1212000890.3314.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:01 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
[snip]
> gpg --list-keys 1E1C9C17
>
> shows all the identities that my key can be used for.

[patrick@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys 1E1C9C17
gpg: error reading key: public key not found

Got these keyservers enabled in .gnupg/gpg.conf

keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net
keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
keyserver ldap://keyserver.pgp.com

No luck with these search links either:
http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?search=1E1C9C17&op=vindex
http://keyserver.pgp.com/vkd/SubmitSearch.event?SearchCriteria=1E1C9C17

Typo?

Regards,
Patrick



------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:03:15 -0400
From: Chris Bredesen <cbredesen@redhat.com>
Subject: OpenJDK not in alternatives after F8-F9 upgrade
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <483DAC73.1010500@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi list,

I have seen others report $subject, but I haven't yet found a solution.
Can you help? I'd like to be able to switch to openjdk using
alternatives.

Thanks,

Chris



------------------------------

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 231
********************************************

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 
Old 05-28-2008, 08:08 PM
Todd Zullinger
 
Default rsync mirror for FC9

Paulo Roncon wrote:
> Where's the mirror to livna to do na rsync in FC9?

rpm.livna.org has rsync enabled. Some of the livna mirrors likely do
as well.

BTW, please don't quote the entire digest!

--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The worst thing about history is that every time it repeats itself,
the price goes up.
-- Pillar

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org