Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:09:23 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > I only mention this because, despite the fact that it continues to
>> > persist in F8, with it being originally filed as arising in F7 the
>> > bug's set to be "officially" closed on June 13.
>> Closed only because no one bothered to confirm whether the bug still
>> exists yet or not.
> It must be very depressing to see the huge number of bugs that stick on a
> NEEDINFO ticket for years, with no-one bothering to follow them up.
Shrug, folks are busy, I think we can all understand that. In a perfect
world all bugs would be fixed, and everyone would get a magical
My take as packager, is that if a bug isn't important enough for followup
(esp after NEEDINFO) or to be reported (properly), then it's not important
enough to take the time/effort to look at and fix. I try to focus on the
stuff that folks care about the most, where I see/hear the most (hopefully)
constructive feedback. hrm... I feel a blog coming on...
fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list