twinview f8
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gilboa Davara a écrit :
> On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:19 +0100, François Patte wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Anyone experienced twinview under f8?
>>
>
> By twinview you mean nVidia twinview?

Yes. And it is now also working for me but without my gnome config....
Something in my config, that I borrowed from fc6, blocks the gnome-panel
at login and I cannot do anything. So I have, one more time, to change
my config.

Why the configs are not fully compatible from one fedora version to
another??? I had some similar problems when I upgraded from fc4 to fc6.

Thanks for your answer.

- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 44 55 35 61
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHQdpkdE6C2dhV2JURAsjHAJ4sP6Wa794u+cDrKoCcru xbFyjfHQCfXS1Y
H96905tCxADK/HTD3HhYxcg=
=lcnc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

twinview f8
 

On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 19:48 +0100, François Patte wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gilboa Davara a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:19 +0100, François Patte wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Bonjour,
> >>
> >> Anyone experienced twinview under f8?
> >>
> >
> > By twinview you mean nVidia twinview?
>
> Yes. And it is now also working for me but without my gnome config....
> Something in my config, that I borrowed from fc6, blocks the gnome-panel
> at login and I cannot do anything. So I have, one more time, to change
> my config.

Being a KDE user I can't really help you. Sorry.

> Why the configs are not fully compatible from one fedora version to
> another??? I had some similar problems when I upgraded from fc4 to fc6.

AFAIR FC6 shipped with GNOME 2.16 while F8 has GNOME 2.20.
A lot of features were added between the two releases... I'd venture and
guess that one of these features/bugs broke your Xinerama support.

Granted, I have the same /home since F2... but KDE did really change
much since ~F4. (Minor 3.5.x releases)

Most likely I'll have to rebuild my configuration from scratch once KDE4
is released.

>
> Thanks for your answer.

No problem.

-Gilboa

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list