Fail to start bacula director with systemctl. REALLY SOLVED.
Am 01.07.2012 06:12, schrieb Erik P. Olsen:
> On 30/06/12 22:43, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 06/30/2012 01:33 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>> Well, since it makes bacula run, it IS a solution allthough I admit it
>>> IS bad.
>>
>> No it isn't. It's a work-around that allows bacula to run while ignoring the
>> central issue: you need to find out how to make bacula run correctly while
>> running as user bacula. If the program itself is owned by that user, you may be
>> able to get things going by using the suid bit. It's a tad weird, I know, and
>> I'm not sure it's a Good Idea. However, if user bacula only has normal
>> privileges, it's *probably* safe.
>
> Turned out to be my fault (of course). Had mistyped a path to a log file so it would only run as root.
and that was meant with "no it is not a solution" run as root :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
|
