FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-22-2012, 02:47 PM
Fernando Cassia
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the main culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.

This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.


Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I tame these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling the whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that I'm not aware of).


Thanks in advance
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario

- George Orwell


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 03:10 PM
Mateusz Marzantowicz
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On 22.06.2012 16:47, Fernando Cassia
wrote:



Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load
process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the main
culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.

This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.

Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I tame
these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling the
whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that I'm not
aware of).

Thanks in advance
FC










In my case tracker-store acts like a fork bomb! After fresh boot I
shortly have a lot (about 50-100) defunct tracker-store and
tracker-extract processes each consuming about 5 MB of memory. I
have to manually kill them or I'm unable to launch any app form
Gnome Shell. yum remove is not an option because of dependencies. I
confirm this behavior on 64 bit box with Fedora 17, on 32 bit Fedora
17 all is fine.



I'm glad, I'm not alone with this problem.





Mateusz Marzantowicz



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 04:50 PM
Rick Stevens
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On 06/22/2012 08:10 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:

On 22.06.2012 16:47, Fernando Cassia wrote:

Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load
process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the main
culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.

This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.

Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I tame
these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling the
whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that I'm not
aware of).

Thanks in advance
FC





In my case tracker-store acts like a fork bomb! After fresh boot I
shortly have a lot (about 50-100) defunct tracker-store and
tracker-extract processes each consuming about 5 MB of memory. I have to
manually kill them or I'm unable to launch any app form Gnome Shell. yum
remove is not an option because of dependencies. I confirm this behavior
on 64 bit box with Fedora 17, on 32 bit Fedora 17 all is fine.

I'm glad, I'm not alone with this problem.


Mateusz Marzantowicz



Have you reported these via bugzilla? It's interesting that it's only
on the 64-bit architecture that this is an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- Do you know where _your_ towel is? -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 05:43 PM
Fernando Cassia
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:

Have you reported these via bugzilla? It's interesting that it's only

on the 64-bit architecture that this is an issue.
Hi Rick,

No I didn't, because I don't even know if this is a bug or the way it's supposed to work. In fact, I don't even know what these processes do.


What I'm certain is that now my system shows 40-45% cpu usage while "idle", and it didn't do that before the last yum update.

For the record, I'm running the 32-bit edition of F17, even while the cpu is 64bit.


FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 06:39 PM
suvayu ali
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@gmail.com> wrote:
> In fact, I don't even know what these processes do.

As far as I know tracker is a very capable and configurable desktop
search service originating as an XFCE app. I think this is just a bug
that needs to be reported.

--
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 06:57 PM
Fernando Cassia
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:39 PM, suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> wrote:

As far as I know tracker is a very capable and configurable desktop

search service originating as an XFCE app. I think this is just a bug

that needs to be reported.
Now CPU usage went down to 10%. (I was away having lunch and just returned)

In any case, nothing that beesu yum remove tracker can't fix.

FC

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 09:25 PM
Mateusz Marzantowicz
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On 22.06.2012 18:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 08:10 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 22.06.2012 16:47, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>> Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load
>>> process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the
>>> main
>>> culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.
>>>
>>> This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.
>>>
>>> Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I
>>> tame
>>> these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling
>>> the
>>> whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that
>>> I'm not
>>> aware of).
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> FC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> In my case tracker-store acts like a fork bomb! After fresh boot I
>> shortly have a lot (about 50-100) defunct tracker-store and
>> tracker-extract processes each consuming about 5 MB of memory. I have to
>> manually kill them or I'm unable to launch any app form Gnome Shell. yum
>> remove is not an option because of dependencies. I confirm this behavior
>> on 64 bit box with Fedora 17, on 32 bit Fedora 17 all is fine.
>>
>> I'm glad, I'm not alone with this problem.
>>
>>
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz
>>
>
> Have you reported these via bugzilla? It's interesting that it's only
> on the 64-bit architecture that this is an issue.

First, I want to make sure it is a bug, then I'd like to know more about
what this app does and how. I was also searching bugzilla for related
reports but it looks like there is no such error report so I'll probably
fill in new report. I just need to gather more info abut this problem.
Is this problem only noticed by Fernando and Me or there are other
people on the list suffering?


Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 10:12 PM
Rick Stevens
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On 06/22/2012 02:25 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:

On 22.06.2012 18:50, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 06/22/2012 08:10 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:

On 22.06.2012 16:47, Fernando Cassia wrote:

Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load
process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the
main
culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.

This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.

Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I
tame
these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling
the
whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that
I'm not
aware of).

Thanks in advance
FC





In my case tracker-store acts like a fork bomb! After fresh boot I
shortly have a lot (about 50-100) defunct tracker-store and
tracker-extract processes each consuming about 5 MB of memory. I have to
manually kill them or I'm unable to launch any app form Gnome Shell. yum
remove is not an option because of dependencies. I confirm this behavior
on 64 bit box with Fedora 17, on 32 bit Fedora 17 all is fine.

I'm glad, I'm not alone with this problem.


Mateusz Marzantowicz



Have you reported these via bugzilla? It's interesting that it's only
on the 64-bit architecture that this is an issue.


First, I want to make sure it is a bug, then I'd like to know more about
what this app does and how. I was also searching bugzilla for related
reports but it looks like there is no such error report so I'll probably
fill in new report. I just need to gather more info abut this problem.
Is this problem only noticed by Fernando and Me or there are other
people on the list suffering?


Tracker is started in your session startup, not via systemctl and you
can disable it if you want. In my case, I have it start in my session.
I am running 64-bit F17 using XFCE and have no issues with it (tracker
version 0.12.10). If I want to disable it I'd go to

Applications->Settings->Settings Manager->Session and Startup

select the "Application Autostart" tab and uncheck the tracker-related
items.

Again, I have no issues and I'm running 64-bit F17 on four machines.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- "Doctor! My brain hurts!" "It will have to come out!" -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-22-2012, 11:55 PM
Kernel Guardian
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

I can confirm tracker-related problems on F16 x86_64 with latest updates.
Two comps: Dual Core Intel, i5 Intel
Laptop Asus U30JC i3 Intel
On every boot on of the trackers tracker-miner-fs or tracker-store eat from 30-80% of cpu depends of cpu architecture. It takes minute or two, then everything become normal.* *
On every installation have GNOME3 and XFCE installed. Most of the time using Cinnamon/GNOME.All trackers are from tracker package.
yum info tracker:
Installed Packages
Name * * * *: tracker
Arch * * * *: x86_64

Version * * : 0.12.10
Release * * : 1.fc16
Size * * * *: 4.8 M
Repo * * * *: installed
From repo * : updates
Summary * * : Desktop-neutral search tool and indexer
URL * * * * : http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/

Licence * * : GPLv2+
Description : Tracker is a powerful desktop-neutral first class object database,
* * * * * *: tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer.
* * * * * *:
* * * * * *: It consists of a common object database that allows entities to have an

* * * * * *: almost infinte number of properties, metadata (both embedded/harvested as
* * * * * *: well as user definable), a comprehensive database of keywords/tags and
* * * * * *: links to other entities.

* * * * * *:
* * * * * *: It provides additional features for file based objects including context
* * * * * *: linking and audit trails for a file object.
* * * * * *:
* * * * * *: It has the ability to index, store, harvest metadata. retrieve and search

* * * * * *: all types of files and other first class objects


On 23 June 2012 00:12, Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 02:25 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:

>>
>> On 22.06.2012 18:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/22/2012 08:10 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 22.06.2012 16:47, Fernando Cassia wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>> Suddenly after a reboot I find between 50-60% of my CPU used. I load
>>>>> process manager and find tracker-store and tracker-extract being the
>>>>> main

>>>>> culprits, with spikes of 90% of cpu usage.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a dual-core AMD Opteron server with 2 gigs of RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who' s the genius who thought this would be acceptable? and how do I

>>>>> tame
>>>>> these processes not to use more than 10% of cpu without uninstalling
>>>>> the
>>>>> whole shebang? (provided those actually serve a useful purpose that

>>>>> I'm not
>>>>> aware of).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>> FC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> In my case tracker-store acts like a fork bomb! After fresh boot I
>>>> shortly have a lot (about 50-100) defunct tracker-store and
>>>> tracker-extract processes each consuming about 5 MB of memory. I have to

>>>> manually kill them or I'm unable to launch any app form Gnome Shell. yum
>>>> remove is not an option because of dependencies. I confirm this behavior
>>>> on 64 bit box with Fedora 17, on 32 bit Fedora 17 all is fine.

>>>>
>>>> I'm glad, I'm not alone with this problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mateusz Marzantowicz
>>>>
>>>
>>> Have you reported these via bugzilla? It's interesting that it's only

>>> on the 64-bit architecture that this is an issue.
>>
>>
>> First, I want to make sure it is a bug, then I'd like to know more about
>> what this app does and how. I was also searching bugzilla for related

>> reports but it looks like there is no such error report so I'll probably
>> fill in new report. I just need to gather more info abut this problem.
>> Is this problem only noticed by Fernando and Me or there are other

>> people on the list suffering?
>
>
> Tracker is started in your session startup, not via systemctl and you
> can disable it if you want. In my case, I have it start in my session.
> I am running 64-bit F17 using XFCE and have no issues with it (tracker

> version 0.12.10). If I want to disable it I'd go to
>
> * *Applications->Settings->Settings Manager->Session and Startup
>
> select the "Application Autostart" tab and uncheck the tracker-related

> items.
>
> Again, I have no issues and I'm running 64-bit F17 on four machines.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital * *ricks@alldigital.com -

> - AIM/Skype: therps2 * * * *ICQ: 22643734 * * * * * *Yahoo: origrps2 -
> - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-
> - * * *"Doctor! *My brain hurts!" *"It will have to come out!" * * * -

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 
Old 06-23-2012, 01:15 AM
Tim
 
Default tracker-store and tracker-extract eating 50% of cpu time on a Dual-core AMD Opteron

On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 01:55 +0200, Kernel Guardian wrote:
> On every boot on of the trackers tracker-miner-fs or tracker-store eat
> from 30-80% of cpu depends of cpu architecture. It takes minute or
> two, then everything become normal.

Just throwing a thought out: On ye olde Fedora, it would run a
makewhatis run once a day, usually scheduled in the wee hours of the
morning, where it shouldn't be a problem to users. For systems running
continuously, that made sense, and worked well. But for systems that
are only booted up from time to time, and not left running 24/7. You
had one of two problems: The morning run never run. Or, the scan could
be done once a day whenever you did have the computer running, and some
computers did get bogged down during its scan.

Has this tracker taken the second approach? And would trying the
"morning scan" approach sidestep the issue?

--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org