Solution to Evolution indexing problems
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:56 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > Recently I requested a solution to an Evolution indexing problem. When
> > the standardly suggested solutions did not work I realized that a final
> > solution existed that worked. Before I installed F16 I backed up all
> > Evolution data using the option under File. So restoring the backup
> > solved the problem. It seems to me if one could periodically back up the
> > Evolution data to prevent having to deal with things like the indexing
> > problem. The down side is of course you loose some mail in the process.
>
> So not actually a solution then.
>
> (BTW the word you want is "lose"; "loose" means something else).
>
> poc
>
You are right about lose and the defect in the solution. I tried a
number of alternative solutions first including the one you suggested
and evolution got worse and worse in terms of it index display. I just
could not stand that Inbox had n real unread messages and 66 unread
messages that I could not see.
--
================================================== =====================
Intuition, however illogical, is recognized as a command prerogative. --
Kirk, "Obsession", stardate 3620.7
================================================== =====================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@sbcglobal.net
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
|
