compiz-fusion and fedora - take 2 :)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > Hi,
> > first to say that I'm aware of current Fedora and compiz situation .
> > I'm not here to repeat discussion about compiz on by default but to
> > start a discussion first with users and then include developers on how
> > to make fedora and compiz-fusion work better.
> > I find compiz package and not also compiz-fusion package installed a
> > much needed correction by default and that is why I posted this RFE 
> The title of the RFE doesn't make much sense. You might want to correct
> that to reflect the current discussion.
> > Are there any of you who have some better idea how can we make fedora
> > and compiz-fusion work better for users? I find that installing
> > compiz-fusion is non-intuitive. Why? Because you need to install it with
> > this command:
> > yum install compiz-fusion compiz-fusion-extras compiz-fusion-gnome
> > compiz-fusion-extras-gnome libcompizconfig ccsm compiz-manager
> > fusion-icon-gtk
> > how can this made easier?
> Request a meta package or yum group.
Is "RFE: Include compiz-fusion and supporting packages by default" better?
Where do I file RFE for meta package or for a yum group? (fedora wiki
and google searches don't provide any info on yum meta packages).
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic
fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list