I would like to congratulate gnome-shell 3.2 for consistently being in the
lead, according to 'top'.


Even when I have 'make -j 8' running, on a single-core CPU.

… Oh wait, folks, we have late breaking news! One of the eight 'cc1plus'es
managed to briefly overtake gnome-shell, for one brief one-second sampling
interval. But the victory was short-lived, as now, one second later, gnome-
shell, once again, is in the lead, leaving everyone else in the dust
watching in awe.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

+1 for the commentary
-------
The code that is hardest to debug is the code that you know cannot possibly be wrong

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@courier-mta.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:16:45
To: <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Congratulations to gnome-shell!

I would like to congratulate gnome-shell 3.2 for consistently being in the*
lead, according to 'top'.

Even when I have 'make -j 8' running, on a single-core CPU.

. Oh wait, folks, we have late breaking news! One of the eight 'cc1plus'es*
managed to briefly overtake gnome-shell, for one brief one-second sampling*
interval. But the victory was short-lived, as now, one second later, gnome-
shell, once again, is in the lead, leaving everyone else in the dust*
watching in awe.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines