Don't depend on product path for finding the anaconda-runtime package
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:33 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Would it be plausible to tail -n 1 it instead? I'm sure the compose
> tools should only pull in one version but given the way some of these
> resolve dependencies they might pull in two versions (or more) and tail
> would get the latest -which may or may not have been modified by a third
> party.
>
> Does that sound plausible? If so, need a patch?
The first was done (iirc) because that ends up being nicer for some of
the ppc/ppc64 cases if you end up with more than one in the tree
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list