ugliness fatal to yum
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:36:58 -0500 (CDT), MH (Michael) wrote:
>
> In response to
> yum 'gstreamer-plugins-ugly'
> I get
Subject line is poorly chosen. You face a problem with rpmfusion unless
you can be certain it is a problem in Yum instead. But let's see:
> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-14-i386
>
> Here is the content of the aforementioned directory:
> [root@localhost rpm-gpg]# ls -F
> RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-i386@
> RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora@ RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-sparc@
> RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-13-SPARC RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-sparc64@
> RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-14-primary RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-x86_64@
> [root@localhost rpm-gpg]#
>
> I suspect that this is easy, but only for someone who knows how.
How did you install the "rpmfusion-free" repository?
Did you install the rpmfusion-free-release package?
(try rpm -q rpmfusion-free-release to test whether it is installed)
(if it is installed, verify the package: rpm -V rpmfusion-free-release
Else:
rpm -ivh http://download2.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/14/i386/rpmfusion-free-release-14-1.noarch.rpm
It contains the needed key files.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fri Aug 26 01:30:02 2011
Return-path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-47235-tom=linux-archive.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:50:23 +0300
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80]:33169 helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-47235-tom=linux-archive.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Qwhod-0006WO-Ja
for tom@linux-archive.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:50:23 +0300
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01D5B21C28F;
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Delivered-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC14321C1F3
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.178.58] (e178081239.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.81.239])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: chithanh)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3F211B4017
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E56C487.5050809@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:54:15 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?=
<chithanh@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110803 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mesa r600 gallium news item
References: <4E56BAB6.5020807@gentoo.org> <CAEdQ38Em_BHwBsGPLkgTq39SXNfp7Vb8rjP=UJFaSGXEOnq_ WQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E56C09E.5000406@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E56C09E.5000406@gentoo.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) schrieb:
> You can point the reader to
> http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature#Decoderringforengineeringvsmarketin=
gnames
> in order to know wether his ATI card is or not an r600 ATI card.
> Specially since the reference to HD2000 includes some r500 cards.
You are right, but that page is slightly confusing and still not 100%
accurate. I think I'll change it to "HD 2400 and later", which should
cover exactly the r600 driven cards.
Best regards,
Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
|
