FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-31-2011, 03:34 AM
Patrick
 
Default privoxy version 3.0.17

Hi -

There's a bug in privoxy I'm hitting that's fixed with the latest version
3.0.17, that version has been out since last November.

How can I get the new version picked up for Fedora 15?

There's already a bug for it:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594003

I don't know who the package maintainer is for it in Fedora (or if there is even one).

Thanks ...

-- Patrick Mansfield
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 07-31-2011, 06:08 AM
Michael Cronenworth
 
Default privoxy version 3.0.17

On 07/30/2011 10:34 PM, Patrick wrote:
> How can I get the new version picked up for Fedora 15?
>
> There's already a bug for it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594003
>
> I don't know who the package maintainer is for it in Fedora (or if there is even one).

One way to see who a maintainer is is to check the ACL[1] for the
package. It seems the package is still maintained.

You should add a "ping" comment to the bug requesting a status on the
update. The maintainer may be waiting to release the update for
dependencies or another reason. If you don't hear back from the
maintainer in the bug in a week or so, try a direct e-mail. As a last
resort you can invoke the non-responsive maintainer process[2].

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/privoxy
[2]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 08-24-2011, 03:49 PM
Patrick
 
Default privoxy version 3.0.17

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:08:03AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 10:34 PM, Patrick wrote:
> > How can I get the new version picked up for Fedora 15?
> >
> > There's already a bug for it:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594003
> >
> > I don't know who the package maintainer is for it in Fedora (or if there is even one).
>
> One way to see who a maintainer is is to check the ACL[1] for the
> package. It seems the package is still maintained.
>
> You should add a "ping" comment to the bug requesting a status on the
> update. The maintainer may be waiting to release the update for
> dependencies or another reason. If you don't hear back from the
> maintainer in the bug in a week or so, try a direct e-mail. As a last
> resort you can invoke the non-responsive maintainer process[2].
>
> [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/privoxy
> [2]
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

I added a comment to the bug (back on July 31), and emailed Karsten (on
Aug 13, I'm cc-ing him here too), and have gotten no responses.

In the meantime, I created an rpm for my own use with 3.0.17 privoxy
source, it's working much better.

-- Patrick Mansfield
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 08-24-2011, 03:51 PM
Patrick
 
Default privoxy version 3.0.17

Oops ... cc-ing Karsten.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:49:51AM -0700, Patrick wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:08:03AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 07/30/2011 10:34 PM, Patrick wrote:
> > > How can I get the new version picked up for Fedora 15?
> > >
> > > There's already a bug for it:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594003
> > >
> > > I don't know who the package maintainer is for it in Fedora (or if there is even one).
> >
> > One way to see who a maintainer is is to check the ACL[1] for the
> > package. It seems the package is still maintained.
> >
> > You should add a "ping" comment to the bug requesting a status on the
> > update. The maintainer may be waiting to release the update for
> > dependencies or another reason. If you don't hear back from the
> > maintainer in the bug in a week or so, try a direct e-mail. As a last
> > resort you can invoke the non-responsive maintainer process[2].
> >
> > [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/privoxy
> > [2]
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I added a comment to the bug (back on July 31), and emailed Karsten (on
> Aug 13, I'm cc-ing him here too), and have gotten no responses.
>
> In the meantime, I created an rpm for my own use with 3.0.17 privoxy
> source, it's working much better.
>
> -- Patrick Mansfield
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 08-24-2011, 03:55 PM
Karsten Hopp
 
Default privoxy version 3.0.17

Am 24.08.2011 17:51, schrieb Patrick:
> Oops ... cc-ing Karsten.
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:49:51AM -0700, Patrick wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:08:03AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2011 10:34 PM, Patrick wrote:
> > > > How can I get the new version picked up for Fedora 15?
> > > >
> > > > There's already a bug for it:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594003
> > > >
> > > > I don't know who the package maintainer is for it in Fedora (or if there is even one).
> > >
> > > One way to see who a maintainer is is to check the ACL[1] for the
> > > package. It seems the package is still maintained.
> > >
> > > You should add a "ping" comment to the bug requesting a status on the
> > > update. The maintainer may be waiting to release the update for
> > > dependencies or another reason. If you don't hear back from the
> > > maintainer in the bug in a week or so, try a direct e-mail. As a last
> > > resort you can invoke the non-responsive maintainer process[2].
> > >
> > > [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/privoxy
> > > [2]
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> >
> > I added a comment to the bug (back on July 31), and emailed Karsten (on
> > Aug 13, I'm cc-ing him here too), and have gotten no responses.
> >
> > In the meantime, I created an rpm for my own use with 3.0.17 privoxy
> > source, it's working much better.
> >
> > -- Patrick Mansfield


I saw your comment, but I'm currently quite busy with secondary arch.
I'f you'd like to either take over or co-maintain privoxy, I'll orphan
the package or approve commit access for you.

Karsten
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org