On 17/06/11 11:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 03:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2011 02:17 AM, Ricardo Veguilla wrote:
>>>> Hi, I've found two bugs related to mouse selection on java swing
>>>> applications running maximized on gnome3,
>> Are the "swing apps" Fedora supplied or from the web?
> If you want to reply to the OP, just do that directly. Replying to my
> mail, removing my answer and not removing my name, makes it looks like
> I asked the question. You are misquoting. Don't do that
That was a slip, not my normal behaviour.
Forgot the thread place.
Friend of fedoraproject.org
users mailing list
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Fri Jun 17 14:30:01 2011
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:31:44 +0300
Received: from bastion02.fedoraproject.org ([18.104.22.168]:40037 helo=bastion.fedoraproject.org)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
for email@example.com; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:31:43 +0300
Received: from lists.fedoraproject.org (collab1.vpn.fedoraproject.org [192.168.1.21])
by bastion02.phx2.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE63110AC0;
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from collab1.fedoraproject.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5E6326792;
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp-mm03.fedoraproject.org (vm4.fedora.ibiblio.org
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69408326783
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp510.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp (smtp510.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp
by smtp-mm03.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8245C37D77
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 31172 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2011 10:33:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.12?) (firstname.lastname@example.org
by smtp510.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 17 Jun 2011 10:33:19 -0000
Subject: Re: GNOME3 and au revoir WAS: systemd: please stop trying to take
over the world
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14)
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
List-Id: Development discussions related to Fedora
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:50 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 03:50 PM, Henrik Wejdmark wrote:
> > On my desktop it's not on "one" page, it's a mile long listing so you get no
> > overview at all. In Gnome2 at least all the apps are categorized. If the
> > graphical user interface _requires_ you to use the keyboard to type the
> > command it has failed it's task and we might as well go back to bash.
> GNOME 3 menu has categories in the right as well but in any case, the
> common apps are in the dash and using a keyboard with a search as you
> type interface isn't the same as using bash. Let us not be dramatic.
Considering the frequent calls of "Gnome 3 has failed at its task" or
the "GUI has failed if the user must ____" makes me wonder: Where is the
task definition or specification against which the implementation has
"Doesn't live up to my expectation" is very different from "Doesn't
comply with spec" and both are different from "Is a bad design".
devel mailing list