FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2011, 12:00 PM
Jim Philips
 
Default Firefox 4 RC1 Remi repo

I can't manage to update to RC1. When I try, yum tells me it depends on gecko-libs 2.0 RC1 and that package is not available. Anyone successfully update from the Remi repo?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 03-11-2011, 03:06 PM
Remi Collet
 
Default Firefox 4 RC1 Remi repo

Le 11/03/2011 14:00, Jim Philips a écrit :
> I can't manage to update to RC1. When I try, yum tells me it depends on
> gecko-libs 2.0 RC1 and that package is not available. Anyone
> successfully update from the Remi repo?
>

# rpm -q --requires firefox4 | grep gecko
gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1

# rpm -q --provides xulrunner2 | grep gecko
gecko-libs = 2.0-rc1
gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1

Both are in remi repository.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:12 PM
Jim Philips
 
Default Firefox 4 RC1 Remi repo

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Remi Collet <Fedora@famillecollet.com> wrote:

Le 11/03/2011 14:00, Jim Philips a écrit :

> I can't manage to update to RC1. When I try, yum tells me it depends on

> gecko-libs 2.0 RC1 and that package is not available. Anyone

> successfully update from the Remi repo?

>



# rpm -q --requires firefox4 | grep gecko

gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1



# rpm -q --provides xulrunner2 | grep gecko

gecko-libs = 2.0-rc1

gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1



Both are in remi repository.



Something must be weird with yum on this end. This is what I get:

--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: firefox-4.0-0.28.rc1.fc14.remi.x86_64 (remi-test)

********** Requires: gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1
********** Installed: xulrunner2-2.0-0.23.b12.fc14.remi.x86_64 (@remi)
************** gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-beta12
********** Available: xulrunner2-2.0-0.22.b12.build1.fc14.remi.x86_64 (remi-test)

************** gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-beta12
********** Available: xulrunner2-2.0-0.12.b11.fc14.i686 (fedora-firefox4)
************** Not found
*You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
*You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:24 PM
"Joseph L. Casale"
 
Default Firefox 4 RC1 Remi repo

>Something must be weird with yum on this end. This is what I get:

It's not weird, look inside your remi repo conf file. It's very much doing
what its likely configured to do. If you have yum priorities setup as you
should, then this would be what would happen if you don't know how
to overwrite base packages intentionally like you need to in this case.

Do you see a "priority" line in that conf file? If so, re-read my last post to you.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:46 PM
Jim Philips
 
Default Firefox 4 RC1 Remi repo

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote:

>Something must be weird with yum on this end. This is what I get:



It's not weird, look inside your remi repo conf file. It's very much doing

what its likely configured to do. If you have yum priorities setup as you

should, then this would be what would happen if you don't know how

to overwrite base packages intentionally like you need to in this case.



Do you see a "priority" line in that conf file? If so, re-read my last post to you.



Thanks! I never saw your previous reply, because GMail moved it to Trash (I had replied from there). I did it that way and it worked. I had never seen this priority flag before. Coming from Ubuntu.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org