On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 23:29 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 14:42 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > I seem to recall that Opera packages its rpm version using that
> > compression system as well. They have a web page detailing the how-to
> > get these setup with older versions of rpm here:
> >
> > http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/2012/01/17/repacking-opera-rpms-for-use-on-older-distros
>
> I encountered that issue a while back. Working from a mandriva SRPM I
> cooked up the attached spec file. Just add tarballs and rpmbuild. You
> might want to bump the version of Opera used.
Oh yes, attachments get stripped. So here's a pastebin:
"SPEC file for Opera on CentOS-5"
http://pastebin.com/K6gMLWsH
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-06-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 12 fully signed off packages
* 28 packages missing signoffs
* 16 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) ==
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (i686), since 2012-07-29
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (x86_64), since 2012-07-29
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (i686), since 2012-08-12
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-12
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
1. dan - 3 signoffs
2. thomas - 1 signoffs
3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs
09-07-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 10 fully signed off packages
* 28 packages missing signoffs
* 16 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) ==
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (i686), since 2012-07-29
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (x86_64), since 2012-07-29
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (i686), since 2012-08-12
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-12
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. dan - 3 signoffs
2. thomas - 1 signoffs
3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs
09-07-2012, 11:01 PM
Juhapekka Tolvanen
I sent that E-Mail 2012-08-10 and I still haven't got any answer.
Hence, it is obvious and evident that Debian-developer is MIA. Please,
follow your own protocols to handle the situation. I think I did what
I must do, already.
P.S: I do not subscribe to mailing-list of Debian.
----- Forwarded message from Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@iki.fi> -----
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:48:23 +0300
From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@iki.fi>
To: fuji@debian.org
Cc: boxes@thomasjensen.com
Subject: Are you MIA?
Reply-To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20120810164823.GA1903@juhtolv.dyndns.org>
Organization: What?+ Me organized?+ Never!1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Mailer-URL: http://www.mutt.org/
X-Editor: GNU Emacs 24.1.1 : http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
I am especially annoyed because of unresolved bug #446102.
But it is also very ridiculous to have RC-bugs like #155182
unresolved many years.
So, are you MIA (Missing In Action) or not? If you haven't got enought
time for Debian, anymore, please find new Debian-developers for your Debian
packages ASAP.
--
Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv
"Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur."
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv
"Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120907230113.GB15159@juhtolv.dyndns.org">http://lists.debian.org/20120907230113.GB15159@juhtolv.dyndns.org
09-08-2012, 12:03 AM
Charles WIlliams
The solution was easy:
-----------------------
# Role: username
subject /usr/bin/akonadi_mailfilter_agent o {
/home/username/.local/share rwcd
-----------------------
I've made no alterations to the policy for my home folder, now that I've
gotten a glimpse of what types of options are possible with gradm.
Charles
09-08-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
1. allan - 4 signoffs
2. thomas - 2 signoffs
3. ronald - 2 signoffs
09-08-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 2 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 10 fully signed off packages
* 30 packages missing signoffs
* 16 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) ==
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (i686), since 2012-07-29
* kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-1:0.9.0.4-1 (x86_64), since 2012-07-29
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (i686), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-pptp-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-0.9.6.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-07
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (i686), since 2012-08-09
* networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* network-manager-applet-0.9.6.2-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (i686), since 2012-08-12
* openconnect-1:4.06-1 (x86_64), since 2012-08-12
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. allan - 4 signoffs
2. thomas - 2 signoffs
3. ronald - 2 signoffs
09-09-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
