=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 11 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 21 fully signed off packages
* 52 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (11 total) ==
Hi gang:
Before F-17 I had become accustomed through experience to using <tab>, hit twice, to get a full list*of the commands; perhaps you set it by default - at least in the release on*the website. This time I upgraded through the link in the mail. Perhaps I*asked this before and forgot the method: what is the proper command to get a
list of all of the commands,*and perhaps, how do I set it up through this*<tab> shortcut?
Thanks,Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
06-22-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 36 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (36 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 19 fully signed off packages
* 54 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 6 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==
* nginx-1.2.1-6 (i686)
* nginx-1.2.1-6 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) ==
1. pierre - 12 signoffs
2. tomegun - 7 signoffs
3. ronald - 4 signoffs
4. ibiru - 1 signoffs
06-23-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 17 fully signed off packages
* 22 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==
1. pierre - 12 signoffs
2. tomegun - 7 signoffs
3. ronald - 4 signoffs
4. ibiru - 1 signoffs
06-24-2012, 02:33 AM
ken
On 06/23/2012 05:36 PM Keith Roberts wrote:
> ....
>
> IIRC that happened a some years ago with Ubuntu.
> Ever since that happened I've been wary of the various
> different custom options available from different Linux
> distros. I just use the Gparted Live CD to do any partition
> work. I don't use LVM either yet, so that's not a problem
> for me now.
Keith,
Years ago I used to create a half dozen partitions from the CLI in an
afternoon and move things around. It was even fun to do. But no more.
LVMs are so cool... you don't have to worry anymore about how big this
and that partition should, never worry about running out of space on a
partition, because with LVM it's simple to make a volume bigger. No
need to move data around. LVM is great, well worth using. If you've
got some spare space on a drive, you should give a try. You won't go
back to partitions.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
06-24-2012, 07:05 AM
Gene Heskett
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:03:53 ken did opine:
> On 06/23/2012 05:36 PM Keith Roberts wrote:
> > ....
> >
> > IIRC that happened a some years ago with Ubuntu.
> > Ever since that happened I've been wary of the various
> > different custom options available from different Linux
> > distros. I just use the Gparted Live CD to do any partition
> > work. I don't use LVM either yet, so that's not a problem
> > for me now.
>
> Keith,
>
> Years ago I used to create a half dozen partitions from the CLI in an
> afternoon and move things around. It was even fun to do. But no more.
> LVMs are so cool... you don't have to worry anymore about how big this
> and that partition should, never worry about running out of space on a
> partition, because with LVM it's simple to make a volume bigger. No
> need to move data around. LVM is great, well worth using. If you've
> got some spare space on a drive, you should give a try. You won't go
> back to partitions.
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've had
it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene>
"Maintain an awareness for contribution -- to your schedule, your project,
our company."
-- A Group of Employees
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
06-24-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 6 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 11 fully signed off packages
* 21 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==
