FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-22-2012, 11:27 PM
Abhishek Dixit
 
Default

I am using 11.10 and trying to update chrome via Update manager but each time I do I get following error
Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/pool/main/g/google-chrome-stable/google-chrome-stable_17.0.963.56-r121963_amd64.deb 404 *Not Found [IP:*




--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 05-22-2012, 11:52 PM
Lucio M Nicolosi
 
Default

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Abhishek Dixit <abhidixit87@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using 11.10 and trying to update chrome via Update manager but each
> time I do I get following error
>
> Failed to fetch
> http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/pool/main/g/google-chrome-stable/google-chrome-stable_17.0.963.56-r121963_amd64.deb
> 404 *Not Found [IP

I guess you should check Software Sources for Chrome parameters:

URI: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/
Distribution: stable
Components: main

L.

--
Lucio M. Nicolosi, Eng.
Open Source Implementation
System and Applications
GNU/Linux

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 05-23-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 17 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 13 fully signed off packages
* 43 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (17 total) ==

* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (i686)
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (i686)
* pciutils-3.1.9-2 (i686)
* udev-182-4 (i686)
* usbutils-005-2 (i686)
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (x86_64)
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (x86_64)
* pciutils-3.1.9-2 (x86_64)
* udev-182-4 (x86_64)
* usbutils-005-2 (x86_64)
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (i686)
* llvm-3.1-1 (i686)
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (i686)
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (x86_64)
* llvm-3.1-1 (x86_64)
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (x86_64)
* hwids-20120512-1 (any)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (12 total) ==

* netcfg-2.8.3-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-3.4-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pciutils-3.1.9-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* udev-182-4 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* usbutils-005-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (31 total) ==

* xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.20120520 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-74 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-69 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-3.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-74 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-69 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-3.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (13 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.9.0-2 (any)
* dnsutils-9.9.1-1 (i686)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
* ldns-1.6.13-1 (i686)
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
* dnsutils-9.9.1-1 (x86_64)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
* ldns-1.6.13-1 (x86_64)
* linux-3.4-1 (x86_64)
* pciutils-3.1.9-2 (x86_64)
* udev-182-4 (x86_64)
* usbutils-005-2 (x86_64)
* hwids-20120512-1 (any)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 7 signoffs
2. stephane - 6 signoffs
3. allan - 6 signoffs
4. dreisner - 1 signoffs
 
Old 05-23-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 16 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (i686)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) ==

* calibre-0.8.52-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.24.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.1.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* ktikz-0.10-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libextractor-0.6.3-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pdf2djvu-0.7.12-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tellico-2.3.5-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* calibre-0.8.52-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.24.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.1.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ktikz-0.10-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libextractor-0.6.3-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pdf2djvu-0.7.12-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tellico-2.3.5-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 7 signoffs
2. stephane - 6 signoffs
3. allan - 6 signoffs
4. dreisner - 1 signoffs
 
Old 05-23-2012, 11:23 AM
Jonathan Riddell
 
Default

----- Forwarded message from Robin Green <greenrd@gmail.com> -----

Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:19:59 +0100
Subject: Bug report: Mailing list reject message is unfriendly
From: Robin Green <greenrd@gmail.com>
To: kubuntu-devel-owner@lists.ubuntu.com
Sender: mailman-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com

I am very annoyed because kcrashhandler told me to report a bug in
apport-kde by email to kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com. But YOU CAN'T
because YOU GET THE MESSAGE "You are not allowed to post to this mailing
list, and your message has
been automatically rejected. "
This is not at all user-friendly.
This was the end of a long list of crashes and incorrect behaviours that I
ran into while trying to report a bug. The user experience needs to be
improved.

--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
 
Old 05-24-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 20 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==

* ndiswrapper-1.57-12 (i686)
* vhba-module-20120422-1 (i686)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-12 (x86_64)
* vhba-module-20120422-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) ==

* calibre-0.8.52-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.24.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.1.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* ktikz-0.10-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libextractor-0.6.3-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-12 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pdf2djvu-0.7.12-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tellico-2.3.5-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20120422-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* calibre-0.8.52-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.24.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.1.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ktikz-0.10-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libextractor-0.6.3-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-12 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pdf2djvu-0.7.12-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tellico-2.3.5-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20120422-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.16-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 1 signoffs
 
Old 05-24-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 44 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) ==

* krb5-1.10.1-3 (i686)
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (i686)
* krb5-1.10.1-3 (x86_64)
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (x86_64)
* fcpci-31107-75 (i686)
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (i686)
* llvm-3.1-2 (i686)
* fcpci-31107-75 (x86_64)
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (x86_64)
* llvm-3.1-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (13 total) ==

* netcfg-2.8.3-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* krb5-1.10.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-3.4-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* krb5-1.10.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (31 total) ==

* xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.20120520 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-75 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-3.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-75 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-3.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* opengtl-0.9.16-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-3.4-1 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 1 signoffs
 
Old 05-24-2012, 01:20 PM
rbmj
 
Default

On 05/21/2012 06:20 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:

Hi, rbmj,

Please keep messages on list.
Read:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/

If you are not subscribed, you will not rec replies to your queries!
Weird, I know, butI thought I'd seen emails from you before hence
thought you were subscribed.



Sorry about that. I wasn't paying attention and hit reply instead of
reply list. It's people like me that convince some people to munge
reply-tos :-D.



If debian-embedd is the wrong list, then please let the list know so
that, hopefully, the mistake will only be made once.


I looked at the mailing list list, and debian-embedded says its for
"Debian on embedded systems". Now, the cross compiler I'm creating
doesn't target Debian, but VxWorks, so my gut reaction is that it would
*not* be the proper mailing list. But I don't know the community over
there. It does mention that there is a debian-gcc list, but that says
its for gcc maintainers. Now, those may be the people most
knowledgeable about my question, but at the same time, it might be
considered off topic there.


Sorry again,

--
rbmj



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Archive: 4FBE35B7.700@verizon.net">http://lists.debian.org/4FBE35B7.700@verizon.net
 
Old 05-24-2012, 03:15 PM
jean durandt
 
Default

...Learn how to organize your work online**http://ferrari-blog.com/twitter.news.php?dlucky=47di0

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 05-25-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 5 fully signed off packages
* 36 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (9 total) ==

* krb5-1.10.1-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-3.4-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* krb5-1.10.1-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.32-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mdadm-3.2.5-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (27 total) ==

* xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.20120520 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-75 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* calligra-2.4.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.17-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-75 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-70 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* inkscape-0.48.3.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kdegraphics-okular-4.8.3-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libreoffice-3.5.3-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.53-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* poppler-0.20.0-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* texlive-bin-2011.3-7 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* xpdf-3.03-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (5 total) ==

* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (i686)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
* linux-3.4-1 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 3 signoffs
2. thomas - 2 signoffs
3. stephane - 1 signoffs
4. allan - 1 signoffs
5. andyrtr - 1 signoffs
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org