How you are trying to upgrade? And one thing Ubuntu 10.10 will upgraded to 12.04, I may be wrong. ----------------------------------------------------------
Dedicated Linux Forum in Bangladesh
2048R/89C932E1
Volunteer, FOSS Bangladesh && Mozilla Reps
01199151550
On 18 May 2012 20:01, Anam Khawja <anamkhawja@yahoo.com> wrote:
hey em getting a problem an error occurred *authentication failed:there may be error with the network or server * while updating ubuntu 10.10 to 11.04 version plx help me..!!
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
05-20-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. allan - 6 signoffs
05-20-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 5 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 19 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. stephane - 2 signoffs
2. dreisner - 2 signoffs
05-21-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 13 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) ==
Please keep messages on list.
Read:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/
If you are not subscribed, you will not rec replies to your queries!
Weird, I know, butI thought I'd seen emails from you before hence
thought you were subscribed.
If debian-embedd is the wrong list, then please let the list know so
that, hopefully, the mistake will only be made once.
----- Forwarded message from rbmj <rbmj@verizon.net> -----
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:34:27 -0400
From: rbmj <rbmj@verizon.net>
To: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
Subject: Re: GCC - Best way to build cross compiler?
On 05/20/2012 11:33 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:00:59PM -0400, rbmj wrote:
>> Bump... Am I posting this on the wrong list?
> Did you see:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg01511.html
>
I did not see that. Thanks for the tip - I'll check that out.
On 05/20/2012 05:27 AM, keith wrote:
> Maybe; take a look here http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
I am on gcc-help, however the problem is not related to building the
cross compiler. That much is fine. What I am having trouble with is
the using the debian toolchain so that I can get proper (i.e. fit for
distribution, so not checkinstall style) debian packages out of the
customized compiler.
Thanks,
--
rbmj
----- End forwarded message -----
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120521102058.GB24726@tal">http://lists.debian.org/20120521102058.GB24726@tal
