FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:46 AM
Md Ashickur Rahman Noor
 
Default

How you are trying to upgrade? And one thing Ubuntu 10.10 will upgraded to 12.04, I may be wrong. ----------------------------------------------------------
Dedicated Linux Forum in Bangladesh


2048R/89C932E1
Volunteer, FOSS Bangladesh && Mozilla Reps


01199151550





On 18 May 2012 20:01, Anam Khawja <anamkhawja@yahoo.com> wrote:


hey em getting a problem an error occurred *authentication failed:there may be error with the network or server * while updating ubuntu 10.10 to 11.04 version plx help me..!!



--

ubuntu-users mailing list

ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com

Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users




--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 05-20-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 6 signoffs
 
Old 05-20-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 5 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 19 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.9.0-1 (any)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
* udev-182-3 (i686)
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
* udev-182-3 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (9 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.9.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* netcfg-2.8.3-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* udev-182-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* udev-182-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (10 total) ==

* gc-7.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* hwloc-1.4.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openmpi-1.6-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* rasqal-1:0.9.29-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* subversion-1.7.5-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* hwloc-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* openmpi-1.6-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rasqal-1:0.9.29-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* subversion-1.7.5-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (1 total) ==

* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 6 signoffs
 
Old 05-21-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26
* mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. stephane - 2 signoffs
2. dreisner - 2 signoffs
 
Old 05-21-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 13 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) ==

* xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.20120520 (any)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.9.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* netcfg-2.8.3-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* udev-182-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libssh2-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* udev-182-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (5 total) ==

* xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.20120520 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* rasqal-1:0.9.29-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gc-7.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rasqal-1:0.9.29-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* e2fsprogs-1.42.3-1 (i686)
* cryptsetup-1.4.2-1 (x86_64)
* subversion-1.7.5-1 (i686)
* subversion-1.7.5-1 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. stephane - 2 signoffs
2. dreisner - 2 signoffs
 
Old 05-21-2012, 10:20 AM
Chris Bannister
 
Default

Hi, rbmj,

Please keep messages on list.
Read:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/

If you are not subscribed, you will not rec replies to your queries!
Weird, I know, butI thought I'd seen emails from you before hence
thought you were subscribed.

If debian-embedd is the wrong list, then please let the list know so
that, hopefully, the mistake will only be made once.

----- Forwarded message from rbmj <rbmj@verizon.net> -----

Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:34:27 -0400
From: rbmj <rbmj@verizon.net>
To: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
Subject: Re: GCC - Best way to build cross compiler?

On 05/20/2012 11:33 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:00:59PM -0400, rbmj wrote:
>> Bump... Am I posting this on the wrong list?
> Did you see:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg01511.html
>

I did not see that. Thanks for the tip - I'll check that out.

On 05/20/2012 05:27 AM, keith wrote:
> Maybe; take a look here http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html

I am on gcc-help, however the problem is not related to building the
cross compiler. That much is fine. What I am having trouble with is
the using the debian toolchain so that I can get proper (i.e. fit for
distribution, so not checkinstall style) debian packages out of the
customized compiler.

Thanks,

--
rbmj

----- End forwarded message -----

--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120521102058.GB24726@tal">http://lists.debian.org/20120521102058.GB24726@tal
 
Old 05-21-2012, 01:21 PM
Tobias Powalowski
 
Default

Hi guys,

Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

The x86_32 switch is not yet enabled.

Please report any issues that arise.
Thanks.

greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa@archlinux.org
 
Old 05-21-2012, 01:21 PM
Tobias Powalowski
 
Default

Hi guys,

Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

The x86_32 switch is not yet enabled.

Please report any issues that arise.
Thanks.

greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa@archlinux.org
 
Old 05-21-2012, 01:34 PM
Genes MailLists
 
Default

On 05/21/2012 09:21 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
...

> Please report any issues that arise.
> Thanks.
>
> greetings
> tpowa

Just a thank you ... for getting this available so quickly - its
impressive and much appreciated.

gene
 
Old 05-21-2012, 02:38 PM
Ionut Biru
 
Default

On 05/21/2012 04:21 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Upstream changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> The x86_32 switch is not yet enabled.
>

No yet? IMO we don't need this option unless we want to start providing
an x86_32 port.

> Please report any issues that arise.
> Thanks.
>
> greetings
> tpowa


--
IonuČ›
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org