Patches 2 and 3 are related to my last anaconda/newui patches.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
05-04-2012, 01:56 PM
Chris Lumens
> Patches 2 and 3 are related to my last anaconda/newui patches.
Aside from my one comment on patch #1, they look good. If you push,
I'll verify and do a build.
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
05-05-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 7 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 6 fully signed off packages
* 18 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) ==
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) ==
* xorg-server-1.12.1-2 (i686), since 2012-04-15
* xorg-server-1.12.1-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-15
* xf86-video-ati-6.14.4-4 (i686), since 2012-04-15
* xf86-video-ati-6.14.4-4 (x86_64), since 2012-04-15
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. heftig - 12 signoffs
2. allan - 11 signoffs
3. dan - 3 signoffs
4. eric - 2 signoffs
5. dreisner - 2 signoffs
05-05-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) ==
* vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. heftig - 12 signoffs
2. allan - 11 signoffs
3. dan - 3 signoffs
4. eric - 2 signoffs
5. dreisner - 2 signoffs
05-06-2012, 07:50 AM
Evangelos Foutras
Reason is that it's buggy and has been unmaintained for close to 3
years. There's currently one open bug about it [1], which I'm not
willing to troubleshoot.
The suggested alternative application is GNOME's archive tool, File Roller.
Unless anyone objects, I'm going to move it to the AUR in a few days.
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29650
05-06-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 8 fully signed off packages
* 18 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) ==
* xorg-server-1.12.1-2 (i686), since 2012-04-15
* xorg-server-1.12.1-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-15
* xf86-video-ati-6.14.4-4 (i686), since 2012-04-15
* xf86-video-ati-6.14.4-4 (x86_64), since 2012-04-15
On 06/05/12 17:50, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> Reason is that it's buggy and has been unmaintained for close to 3
> years. There's currently one open bug about it [1], which I'm not
> willing to troubleshoot.
>
> The suggested alternative application is GNOME's archive tool, File Roller.
>
> Unless anyone objects, I'm going to move it to the AUR in a few days.
>
> [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29650
>
I'm fine with that. I seem to have been maintaining my own patched
version for better xz support anyway... I just installed file-roller
and it looks a good alternative.
Allan
05-06-2012, 03:38 PM
Keith Powell
On 06/05/2012 3:48 PM, Danny Raufeisen wrote:
Hi,
have you tried launching "wubi.exe" from the top level directory of the CD?
cheers
Danny
Hello Danny.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Before I received your posting, I found out that Wubi.exe is available
on the Ubuntu web site. So I have downloaded it, installed it and ran it.
Xubuntu is now installed inside Windows!
Cheers.
Keith
--
xubuntu-users mailing list
xubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users
05-06-2012, 05:09 PM
ignacio burgaleta
I have trouble config.with yum when downloaded openoffice and could no open
_______________________________________________
laptop mailing list
laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/laptop
