FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-26-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any)
* cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686)
* vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686)
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64)
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64)
* cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64)
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64)
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
* vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 21 signoffs
2. dreisner - 8 signoffs
3. eric - 4 signoffs
 
Old 03-26-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 21 fully signed off packages
* 35 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==

* gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64)
* raptor-2.0.7-1 (i686)
* raptor-2.0.7-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (20 total) ==

* tzdata-2012b-3 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-3.3-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openldap-2.4.30-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnupg-2.0.18-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* openldap-2.4.30-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (10 total) ==

* fcpci-31107-70 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.33-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* raptor-2.0.7-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-70 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.33-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* raptor-2.0.7-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) ==

* archlinux-keyring-20120321-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* bootchart-1.15-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* bootchart-1.15-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (21 total) ==

* initscripts-2012.03.1-1 (any)
* netcfg-2.7.1-1 (any)
* binutils-2.22-5 (i686)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (i686)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686)
* glibc-2.15-9 (i686)
* gnupg-2.0.18-2 (i686)
* gpgme-1.3.1-4 (i686)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (i686)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686)
* binutils-2.22-5 (x86_64)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (x86_64)
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64)
* glibc-2.15-9 (x86_64)
* gpgme-1.3.1-4 (x86_64)
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (x86_64)
* linux-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (x86_64)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==

* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686), since 2012-02-17
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64), since 2012-02-17
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686), since 2012-03-07
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-07
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686), since 2012-03-08
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-08


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 21 signoffs
2. dreisner - 8 signoffs
3. eric - 4 signoffs
 
Old 03-26-2012, 04:01 PM
Shalom Ben-Zvi
 
Default

 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686)
* vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. stephane - 22 signoffs
2. tomegun - 10 signoffs
 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 3 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 30 fully signed off packages
* 26 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) ==

* initscripts-2012.03.2-1 (any)
* coreutils-8.16-2 (i686)
* coreutils-8.16-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (14 total) ==

* initscripts-2012.03.2-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* coreutils-8.16-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openldap-2.4.30-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* coreutils-8.16-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* openldap-2.4.30-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (7 total) ==

* fcpci-31107-70 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.33-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-70 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) ==

* archlinux-keyring-20120321-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* bootchart-1.15-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* bootchart-1.15-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (30 total) ==

* netcfg-2.7.1-1 (any)
* tzdata-2012b-3 (any)
* binutils-2.22-5 (i686)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (i686)
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686)
* glibc-2.15-9 (i686)
* gnupg-2.0.18-2 (i686)
* gpgme-1.3.1-4 (i686)
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (i686)
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (i686)
* linux-3.3-1 (i686)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (i686)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686)
* binutils-2.22-5 (x86_64)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (x86_64)
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64)
* glibc-2.15-9 (x86_64)
* gnupg-2.0.18-2 (x86_64)
* gpgme-1.3.1-4 (x86_64)
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (x86_64)
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (x86_64)
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (x86_64)
* linux-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (x86_64)
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (x86_64)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64)
* nvidia-295.33-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==

* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686), since 2012-02-17
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64), since 2012-02-17
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686), since 2012-03-07
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-07
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686), since 2012-03-08
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-08


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. stephane - 22 signoffs
2. tomegun - 10 signoffs
 
Old 03-28-2012, 12:27 AM
mark
 
Default

Finally. This is more than annoying.
<http://forums.opensuse.org/applications/425619-cannot-launch-url-thunderbird-3-04b-firefox.html>

Config editor:
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.ftp default boolean false
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.http default boolean false
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.https default boolean false

Change all of those to "true".

Oh, and for those of us that loathe gnome, edit
/usr/lib/thunderbird/open-browser.sh to, right after

# No URL specified so set to blank
url=$1
if [ -z $url ]; then
url=about:blank
fi

Add:
exec firefox -new-tab "$url"
exit

and all is good again.

mark
--
"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain.
Anything that is disagreeable must surely have beneficial economic
effects." - John Kenneth Galbraith
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 03-28-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 6 signoffs
2. tomegun - 5 signoffs
 
Old 03-28-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 29 fully signed off packages
* 22 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==

* expat-2.1.0-1 (i686)
* gnupg-2.0.19-1 (i686)
* expat-2.1.0-1 (x86_64)
* gnupg-2.0.19-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (12 total) ==

* coreutils-8.16-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* expat-2.1.0-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* gnupg-2.0.19-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* iptables-1.4.12.2-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* wpa_actiond-1.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* xfsprogs-3.1.8-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (7 total) ==

* fcpci-31107-70 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-295.33-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-70 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-66 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-13 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) ==

* archlinux-keyring-20120321-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (29 total) ==

* netcfg-2.7.1-1 (any)
* tzdata-2012b-3 (any)
* binutils-2.22-5 (i686)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (i686)
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686)
* glibc-2.15-9 (i686)
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (i686)
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (i686)
* linux-3.3-1 (i686)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (i686)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686)
* binutils-2.22-5 (x86_64)
* coreutils-8.16-2 (x86_64)
* dhcpcd-5.5.5-1 (x86_64)
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64)
* expat-2.1.0-1 (x86_64)
* gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64)
* glibc-2.15-9 (x86_64)
* gnupg-2.0.19-1 (x86_64)
* iproute2-3.3.0-1 (x86_64)
* krb5-1.10.1-2 (x86_64)
* libtool-2.4.2-5 (x86_64)
* linux-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-api-headers-3.3-1 (x86_64)
* linux-lts-3.0.26-1 (x86_64)
* sqlite3-3.7.11-1 (x86_64)
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64)
* nvidia-295.33-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==

* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (i686), since 2012-02-17
* cups-filters-1.0.1-1 (x86_64), since 2012-02-17
* syslinux-4.05-4 (i686), since 2012-03-07
* syslinux-4.05-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-07
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (i686), since 2012-03-08
* dirmngr-1.1.0-4 (x86_64), since 2012-03-08


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 6 signoffs
2. tomegun - 5 signoffs
 
Old 03-28-2012, 08:05 PM
Maxim Wexler
 
Default

>>
>>> with ppp connections you are not using a dhcp client, pppd gets the
>>> nameserver ip addressess as part of the connection negotiation (if
>>> peerdns is set) and the aforemetioned script in
>>> /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/40-dns.sh writes those to /etc/resolv.conf

This is at the top of /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by dhcpcd
# /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line
# /etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace this line

But according to /var/log/messages:

Mar 28 13:24:01 lumby pppd[16825]: primary DNS address 75.153.176.1
Mar 28 13:24:01 lumby pppd[16825]: secondary DNS address 75.153.176.9

But whatever is in resolv.conf is overwritten with blanks AFTER I
connect. Which creates this odd situation where I can ping numbers,
ie, 8.8.8.8 but not com, net, org etc.

Once I "connect" I have to echo the DNS addresses into resolv.conf
before I can reach anything.

Also, I notice whenever I set up a route to my router those numbers
get wiped. Is that the default behavio(u)r?. NB, I have nothing in the
way of services other than ppp configured at all. Maybe later after I
sort it all out I'll rig up something automatic.

Thanks for everybody's hlp

MW

ps: according to /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/40-dns.sh:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#!/bin/sh

# Handle resolv.conf generation when usepeerdns pppd option is being used.
# Used parameters and environment variables:
# $1 - interface name (e.g. ppp0)
# $USEPEERDNS - set if user specified usepeerdns
# $DNS1 and $DNS2 - DNS servers reported by peer

if [ "$USEPEERDNS" ]; then

if [ -x /sbin/resolvconf ]; then
{
echo "# Generated by ppp for $1"
[ -n "$DNS1" ] && echo "nameserver $DNS1"
[ -n "$DNS2" ] && echo "nameserver $DNS2"
} | /sbin/resolvconf -a "$1"
else
# add the server supplied DNS entries to /etc/resolv.conf
# (taken from debian's 0000usepeerdns)

# follow any symlink to find the real file
REALRESOLVCONF=$(readlink -f /etc/resolv.conf)

if [ "$REALRESOLVCONF" != "/etc/ppp/resolv.conf" ]; then

# merge the new nameservers with the other options from the old configuration
{
grep --invert-match '^nameserver[[:space:]]' $REALRESOLVCONF
cat /etc/ppp/resolv.conf
} > $REALRESOLVCONF.tmp

# backup the old configuration and install the new one
cp -dpP $REALRESOLVCONF $REALRESOLVCONF.pppd-backup
mv $REALRESOLVCONF.tmp $REALRESOLVCONF

# correct permissions
chmod 0644 /etc/resolv.conf
chown root:root /etc/resolv.conf
fi
fi

fi

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the software is aware of two resolv.confs, one under /etc/, one under
/etc/ppp. /etc/ppp/resolv.conf is correctly filled in, but the other
is wiped. Can anyone see why?

MW
 
Old 03-28-2012, 09:55 PM
les
 
Default

-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Joe Zeff <joe@zeff.us>
> To: hlhowell@pacbell.net
> Subject: Re: Processor time consumption
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:26:16 -0700
>
> On 03/28/2012 09:50 AM, les wrote:
> > I don't think it is RAM space being consumed. System Monitor shows very
> > little memory in use, and very little network processing.
>
> OK, that's one blind alley eliminated. However, this should have gone
> to the list so that everybody knew about it.
I mistakenly sent this only to Joe, but it applies to the thread.
Regards,
Les H

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org