FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-16-2012, 09:50 PM
Uli Armbruster
 
Default

* Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> [16.01.2012 23:33]:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos
> <registo.mailling@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >>
> >> Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there
> >> yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was
> >> a good idea to move it.
> >
> > I was merging the .pacnew files and some options that were on the "old"
> > pacman.conf are not present in the "new" one, namely 'ShowSize' and
> > 'ILoveCandy'.
>
> VerbosePkgLists is the new ShowSize.

And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden gimmick for us cool people
 
Old 01-16-2012, 09:59 PM
Giorgio Lando
 
Default

On Mon 16/01/12, 23:50, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden gimmick for us cool people

It is a secret which should not even be named in public
 
Old 01-16-2012, 10:01 PM
Scott Lawrence
 
Default

On 01/16/2012 05:59 PM, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> It is a secret which should not even be named in public

Too late. They know. They're coming.

--
Scott Lawrence
 
Old 01-16-2012, 10:14 PM
Leonid Isaev
 
Default

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:59:16 +0100
Giorgio Lando <giorgio.lando@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon 16/01/12, 23:50, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> > And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden
> > gimmick for us cool people
>
> It is a secret which should not even be named in public

Erm, it's on wikipedia page about easter eggs...

--
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D
Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
 
Old 01-16-2012, 10:24 PM
Mauro Santos
 
Default

On 16-01-2012 22:50, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> * Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> [16.01.2012 23:33]:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos
>> <registo.mailling@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there
>>>> yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was
>>>> a good idea to move it.
>>>
>>> I was merging the .pacnew files and some options that were on the "old"
>>> pacman.conf are not present in the "new" one, namely 'ShowSize' and
>>> 'ILoveCandy'.
>>
>> VerbosePkgLists is the new ShowSize.
>
> And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden gimmick for us cool people
>

I know it wasn't in the default pacman.conf but I think it was
documented. Either way, pacman is on the loose and can't be caught

--
Mauro Santos
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:08 AM
Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
 
Default

El 16/01/12 20:24, Mauro Santos escribió:

On 16-01-2012 22:50, Uli Armbruster wrote:

* Karol Blazewicz<karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> [16.01.2012 23:33]:

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mauro Santos
<registo.mailling@gmail.com> wrote:

On 16-01-2012 21:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:

Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there
yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was
a good idea to move it.

I was merging the .pacnew files and some options that were on the "old"
pacman.conf are not present in the "new" one, namely 'ShowSize' and
'ILoveCandy'.

VerbosePkgLists is the new ShowSize.

And 'ILoveCandy' was never in the default pacman.conf, that's a hidden gimmick for us cool people


I know it wasn't in the default pacman.conf but I think it was
documented. Either way, pacman is on the loose and can't be caught


pacman --version

.--. Pacman v4.0.1 - libalpm v7.0.1
/ _.-' .-. .-. .-. Copyright (C) 2006-2011 Pacman Development Team
'-. '-' '-' '-' Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet
'--'
This program may be freely redistributed under
the terms of the GNU General Public License.



sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
archlinuxfr is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Targets (14): cmake-2.8.7-2 intltool-0.50.0-1
libreoffice-base-3.4.5-1 libreoffice-calc-3.4.5-1
libreoffice-common-3.4.5-1 libreoffice-es-3.4.5-1
libreoffice-extension-typo-3.4.5-1
libreoffice-impress-3.4.5-1 libreoffice-writer-3.4.5-1
pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1
sdl_image-1.2.11-1 sdl_mixer-1.2.12-1 sdl_net-1.2.8-1
sdl_ttf-2.0.11-1


Total Installed Size: 277,30 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 0,24 MiB

Proceed with installation? [Y/n] Y
(14/14) checking package integrity
[#################################] 100%
error: cmake: signature from "Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com>" is
unknown trust
error: intltool: signature from "Eric Belanger <eric@archlinux.org>" is
unknown trust
error: libreoffice-es: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-common: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-base: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-calc: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-extension-typo: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-impress: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: libreoffice-writer: signature from "Andreas Radke
<andyrtr@archlinux.org>" is unknown trust
error: pacman-contrib: signature from "Allan McRae <me@allanmcrae.com>"
is unknown trust
error: sdl_image: signature from "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
<jan.steffens@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: sdl_mixer: signature from "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
<jan.steffens@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: sdl_net: signature from "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
<jan.steffens@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: sdl_ttf: signature from "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
<jan.steffens@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP
signature))

Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.


=(
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:10 AM
Karol Blazewicz
 
Default

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
<ulpianosonsi@gmail.com> wrote:
> error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP
> signature))
> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll'?
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:27 AM
Karol Blazewicz
 
Default

> meant that there was no sig checking for now. if this is correct why pacman
> is looking for signatures?
>
> btw, there is no 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll' option in my
> */etc/pacman.conf file, should I just add this line?

Did you merge pacnew files?

Tue Jan 17 04:30:02 2012
Return-path: <arch-general-bounces@archlinux.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:29:03 +0200
Received: from gerolde.archlinux.org ([66.211.214.132]:47598)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <arch-general-bounces@archlinux.org>)
id 1RmynH-0001UD-JS
for tom@linux-archive.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:29:03 +0200
Received: from gudrun.archlinux.org (gudrun.archlinux.org [66.211.214.131])
by gerolde.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698FE900BC;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:28:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gerolde.archlinux.org (gerolde.archlinux.org [66.211.214.132])
by gudrun.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1225861CE
for <arch-general@archlinux.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:28:51 -0500 (EST)
Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: 209.85.213.44 is authorized
to use 'ulpianosonsi@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism
'ip4:209.85.128.0/17' matched)) receiver=gerolde.archlinux.org;
identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="ulpianosonsi@gmail.com";
helo=mail-yw0-f44.google.com; client-ip 9.85.213.44
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.213.44])
by gerolde.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91E9900B8
for <arch-general@archlinux.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:28:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: by yhnn12 with SMTP id n12so802423yhn.3
for <arch-general@archlinux.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:28:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=Q+4CMnko3M5nN9rHLZaBv4GxDzzyLCB0dIrQWw8g+q8=;
b=wR4CQohyALjKje3JT7602vMyrSqqtYUayYPiIwoPC++HtkUn gVqjDVLVx/kAT/2IIw
1qnFi8r4cdCXquz2GiUdNb8gYRvZYKNcG1TeqM8a2S/nbykWtVqVic2lw+FBZ11kEw3g
2A7gEuNKx+t+5o7Y5pWLRFfRaMPCp/BeHWjskReceived: by 10.236.9.106 with SMTP id 70mr20275243yhs.118.1326767339776;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([190.196.74.84])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j11sm55545789anl.8.2012.01.16.18.28.58
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F14DCE9.5010804@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:28:57 -0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBsZSBQcmVzdGUgZGUgVmF1YmFu? <ulpianosonsi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@archlinux.org>
References: <CAO0v=MMU1mrw04=MyQxrfMF+9oAvPkpp1AiWiT51nScd5oeC PA@mail.gmail.com>
<4F149C1C.3050308@archlinux.org> <4F14A554.5050903@gmail.com>
<CAO0v=MOUoWuNyn55=LXo1Ap_XNZbpuWikdakJ-OfP9QnPpP1wA@mail.gmail.com>
<20120116225023.GA5038@Archlinux> <4F14B1AF.2050107@gmail.com>
<4F14D825.7060704@gmail.com>
<CAO0v=MMyB-KN6qvdR=GTrdK6RUwVq512=DWzwHE8tUFTaZvE_Q@mail.gmai l.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO0v=MMyB-KN6qvdR=GTrdK6RUwVq512=DWzwHE8tUFTaZvE_Q@mail.gmai l.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]
X-BeenThere: arch-general@archlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@archlinux.org>
List-Id: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general.archlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/options/arch-general>,
<mailto:arch-general-request@archlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general>
List-Post: <mailto:arch-general@archlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arch-general-request@archlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-general>,
<mailto:arch-general-request@archlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: arch-general-bounces@archlinux.org
Sender: arch-general-bounces@archlinux.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El 16/01/12 23:10, Karol Blazewicz escribió:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
> <ulpianosonsi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP
>> signature))
>> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
> Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll'?
>
I forgot to mention that after upgrading pacman I was told to
pacman-key --init

Maybe this enabled the sig checking?
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:34 AM
Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
 
Default

El 16/01/12 23:27, Karol Blazewicz escribió:

meant that there was no sig checking for now. if this is correct why pacman
is looking for signatures?

btw, there is no 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll' option in my
/etc/pacman.conf file, should I just add this line?

Did you merge pacnew files?

ok, problem solved, I should had read the announcement in the front
page. Sorry.
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:57 AM
Don Juan
 
Default

On 01/16/2012 06:28 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:

El 16/01/12 23:10, Karol Blazewicz escribió:

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
<ulpianosonsi@gmail.com> wrote:

error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP
signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Did you edit pacman.conf and uncommented 'SigLevel = Optional TrustAll'?


I forgot to mention that after upgrading pacman I was told to
pacman-key --init

Maybe this enabled the sig checking?
It does not I just ran that after i merged the pacnew and it did not
check for any signatures. I think you just missed merging the new pacnew
file in to your old conf
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org