FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-12-2012, 02:19 PM
José Ramón García
 
Default

On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
>
> * 4 known bad packages
>
What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off
report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has
been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.
 
Old 01-12-2012, 03:43 PM
Ionut Biru
 
Default

On 01/12/2012 05:19 PM, José Ramón GarcÃ*a wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
>>
>> * 4 known bad packages
>>
> What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off
> report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has
> been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.

open a feature request.

those packages are not bad in the sense that you will end up with a non
booting system or data loses.

they have minor issues, like a missing module from kernel

--
IonuÈ›
 
Old 01-12-2012, 08:31 PM
Rik Theys
 
Default

Hi,

I'm just an end-user but personally I would prefer to see Wheezy release
with a more recent kernel than 3.2. If Wheezy freezes in June linux 3.4
might already be released. When Wheezy releases there will be a 3.5 and
likely even a 3.6.


Having a more recent kernel (like 3.4) will result in having support for
a lot more recent hardware, and possibly more features.


Some of the later fixes might also be easier to backport to a more
recent kernel.


But I have absolutely no experience in maintaining a distribution kernel
and have no idea on what requires the most work (doing stable updates or
backporting drivers), so I could be wrong.


Regards.

Rik


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4F0F5125.1060803@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/4F0F5125.1060803@gmail.com
 
Old 01-13-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 2 signoffs
 
Old 01-13-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 13 new packages in last 24 hours
* 2 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 8 fully signed off packages
* 36 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (13 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.8.2-1 (any)
* hdparm-9.38-1 (i686)
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (i686)
* linux-3.2.1-1 (i686)
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (i686)
* udev-177-1 (i686)
* hdparm-9.38-1 (x86_64)
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (x86_64)
* linux-3.2.1-1 (x86_64)
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (x86_64)
* udev-177-1 (x86_64)
* kmod-3-6 (i686)
* kmod-3-6 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (11 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.8.2-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* hdparm-9.38-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* linux-3.2.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* udev-177-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* hdparm-9.38-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* linux-3.2.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* udev-177-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (23 total) ==

* claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* cmake-2.8.7-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-66 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-62 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gvfs-1.10.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* hplip-3.11.12-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* kmod-3-6 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-10 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-290.10-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* cmake-2.8.7-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-66 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-62 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gvfs-1.10.1-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* hplip-3.11.12-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* kmod-3-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-10 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* btrfs-progs-0.19.20120110-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* btrfs-progs-0.19.20120110-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (8 total) ==

* coreutils-8.15-1 (i686)
* pacman-4.0.1-3 (i686)
* coreutils-8.15-1 (x86_64)
* pacman-4.0.1-3 (x86_64)
* namcap-3.2.1-1 (any)
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686)
* nvidia-290.10-2 (x86_64)
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686), since 2011-10-15
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-15
* namcap-3.2.1-1 (any), since 2011-10-20


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 2 signoffs
 
Old 01-14-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 8 signoffs
2. thomas - 5 signoffs
3. ibiru - 4 signoffs
4. foutrelis - 3 signoffs
5. stativ - 1 signoffs
 
Old 01-14-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 9 fully signed off packages
* 37 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==

* libarchive-3.0.3-2 (i686)
* pacman-4.0.1-4 (i686)
* libarchive-3.0.3-2 (x86_64)
* pacman-4.0.1-4 (x86_64)
* nvidia-lts-290.10-3 (i686)
* nvidia-lts-290.10-3 (x86_64)
* linux-lts-3.0.17-1 (i686)
* linux-lts-3.0.17-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (11 total) ==

* hdparm-9.38-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* libarchive-3.0.3-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pacman-4.0.1-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* udev-177-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* hdparm-9.38-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* inetutils-1.9.1-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* libarchive-3.0.3-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pacman-4.0.1-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rpcbind-0.2.0-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (23 total) ==

* claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* cmake-2.8.7-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-66 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-62 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gvfs-1.10.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* kmod-3-6 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-10 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-290.10-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-lts-290.10-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* cmake-2.8.7-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* fcpci-31107-66 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcpcmcia-31107-62 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gvfs-1.10.1-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* kmod-3-6 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* lirc-1:0.9.0-10 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nvidia-lts-290.10-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) ==

* linux-lts-3.0.17-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* btrfs-progs-0.19.20120110-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-lts-3.0.17-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (9 total) ==

* mkinitcpio-0.8.2-1 (any)
* linux-3.2.1-1 (i686)
* linux-3.2.1-1 (x86_64)
* udev-177-1 (x86_64)
* namcap-3.2.1-1 (any)
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686)
* nvidia-290.10-2 (x86_64)
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64)
* btrfs-progs-0.19.20120110-1 (i686)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686), since 2011-10-15
* pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-15
* namcap-3.2.1-1 (any), since 2011-10-20


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 8 signoffs
2. thomas - 5 signoffs
3. ibiru - 4 signoffs
4. foutrelis - 3 signoffs
5. stativ - 1 signoffs
 
Old 01-15-2012, 03:38 AM
false
 
Default

Hi Everyone:*My Machine:* Toshiba NB 305 (Netbook), 1 GB RAM, 250 GB HD, installed Fedora 16 (3.1.0-7.fc16.i686) to external USB hard disk (Toshiba 80GB).* Boatloader also installed to external HD. Two partitions, root and swap.*Problem:* Install went well.* On first boot (and all subsequent), received following error:*"Loading initial ramdisk1. 175159 Initramfs unpacking failed: junk in compressed archiveKernel panic - not syncing: no init foundtry passing init= option to kernel"*Remarks:* Running from the liveusb stick works well, no problems.*Thanks for any help._____________________________________________ __
laptop mailing list
laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/laptop
 
Old 01-15-2012, 05:15 AM
false
 
Default

Update:I reinstalled F16 to the external usb HD using the default partitions.* New problem: on "loading initial ramdisk", the system goes to a black screen and then reboots.*BTW, GRUB is loaded onto the external HD.*Thanks.
From: false <ramjacinc@yahoo.com>
To: "laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org" <laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:38 AM
Subject:


Hi Everyone:*My Machine:* Toshiba NB 305 (Netbook), 1 GB RAM, 250 GB HD, installed Fedora 16 (3.1.0-7.fc16.i686) to external USB hard disk (Toshiba 80GB).* Boatloader also installed to external HD. Two partitions, root and swap.*Problem:* Install went well.* On first boot (and all subsequent), received following error:*"Loading initial ramdisk1. 175159 Initramfs unpacking failed: junk in compressed archiveKernel panic - not syncing: no init foundtry passing init= option to kernel"*Remarks:* Running from the liveusb stick works well, no problems.*Thanks for any
help.
_______________________________________________
laptop mailing list
laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/laptop

_______________________________________________
laptop mailing list
laptop@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/laptop
 
Old 01-15-2012, 08:07 AM
Arch Website Notification
 
Default

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==

* balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
* pinot-0.98-2 (i686)
* balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
* pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) ==

* balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 13 signoffs
2. remy - 6 signoffs
3. ttopper - 2 signoffs
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org