On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2011 16:12:24 Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> I am maintaining qalculate-kde and would like to keep it in extra. I
>> prefer it over qalculate-gtk and it seems logical to keep
>> qalculate-kde along with qalculate-gtk and libqalculate in extra. Why
>> do you want to move kdelibs3 to community? If it's because it's
>> orphaned, I can adopt it and qt3 as well. *I suppose they are low
>> maintenance.
> Yes, that's the problem: too low maintainance from upstream too. On big
> rebuilds (like libpng, gcc46) it needs to be patched; anyway usually I copy
> the patches from others distro.
>
> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but if
> you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.
>
I've adopted kdelib3, qt3 and qt3-doc. They'll all stay in [extra].
> --
> Andrea
>
07-14-2011, 01:41 AM
Buddhika Kurera
Hello Fellow Design Team mates,
We have following requests from the FUDcon Pune, organizers.They have opened 3 tickets at the moment and out of them 2 has been already accepted.But if you are interested please speck out, we prefer more design concepts rather than having one.
Booklethttps://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/193
If you are interested please go ahead and accept them, I ll keep constant communication with*
you all to ensure that the materials can be delivered on time. Thanks for the time.
See you soon, Keep In touch.
--
Regards,Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera
Fedora Ambassador Sri LankaEvent*Liaison*- Design Team
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
07-14-2011, 03:25 AM
Hi are you doing good? You must read this story! I bought a new car with my first check from for this company. It would be a shame to pass up this opportunity! http://bit.ly/nu8tQC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: F4.87.03893.F816E1E4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com">http://lists.debian.org/F4.87.03893.F816E1E4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com
07-15-2011, 12:00 PM
Roland Schwingel
Hi.....
Finally I got it *I don't know
whether I did it the fully correct way, but it works now.
I found that this mysterious replica
id 3 was stored in dse.ldif of my server-b:
To recap my scenario:
* * * server A * * < ----- * * *
server B * * * * * <-----> * *
* *server C * * * * * *----->
* *server D
nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 1
ldap://server-b.mydomain.de:389} 4e
*1ffa26
# search result
search: 2
result: 0 Success
# numResponses: 2
# numEntries: 1
When I look at it I see that replica id 3 is assigned
to my server-d
(which should get that replica id). I started over
deleted my server-d
assigned it replica id 4 but nothing changes.
I also cannot get rid of the informations for server-d
in that nsuniqueid
how can I do that?
Thanks,
Roland
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
07-16-2011, 02:01 AM
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:07 -0400, DV wrote:
> I would try the bios setting AHCI (vs. compatibility mode) if you have it.
>
> http://www.911cd.net/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t23099.html
>
> This is the SATA Advanced Host Controller Interface:
>
> http://www.techmetica.com/howto/sata-ahci-mode-bios-setting.-what-does-it-do/
I have all of the SATA channels set to AHCI mode, which includes the
Pioneer burner. I was thinking that maybe I should try changing the
BIOS setting to IDE, but then tossed it aside as crazy talk.
After your email, I decided to change the DVDRW drive's SATA channel to
IDE mode. Bingo! The CentOS 6 DVD booted. I have CentOS 6 running and
fully updated now.
I haven't looked into why the SATA Pioneer DVDRW needed AHCI disabled in
order to boot off the CentOS 6 DVD. Since the Fedora 15 DVD booted
without issue, I can only surmise isolinux in CentOS 6 and in Fedora 15
behave differently.
Thanks to everyone that tried to help out. I appreciate everyone's
efforts.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:18:37 up 12:07, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.16, 0.08
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
07-16-2011, 05:11 AM
Arun Khan
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
<m3freak@thesandhufamily.ca> wrote:
..................
> I have all of the SATA channels set to AHCI mode, which includes the
> Pioneer burner. *I was thinking that maybe I should try changing the
> BIOS setting to IDE, but then tossed it aside as crazy talk.
>
> After your email, I decided to change the DVDRW drive's SATA channel to
> IDE mode. *Bingo! The CentOS 6 DVD booted. *I have CentOS 6 running and
> fully updated now.
>
> I haven't looked into why the SATA Pioneer DVDRW needed AHCI disabled in
> order to boot off the CentOS 6 DVD. Since the Fedora 15 DVD booted
> without issue, I can only surmise isolinux in CentOS 6 and in Fedora 15
> behave differently.
Hmm. I am facing an unrelated problem [1] but the root cause could be
similar to your problem. I'll try changing SATA from "enhanced" to
"legacy" mode.
[1] Linux Mint Debian Edition installs successfully, BIOS is able to
see the hard drive but complaints there is no boot disk!
--
Arun Khan
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
07-18-2011, 10:25 AM
Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 13 juillet 2011 22:16:35 Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
> On Wednesday 13 July 2011 16:12:24 Eric Bélanger wrote:
> > I am maintaining qalculate-kde and would like to keep it in extra. I
> > prefer it over qalculate-gtk and it seems logical to keep
> > qalculate-kde along with qalculate-gtk and libqalculate in extra. Why
> > do you want to move kdelibs3 to community? If it's because it's
> > orphaned, I can adopt it and qt3 as well. I suppose they are low
> > maintenance.
>
> Yes, that's the problem: too low maintainance from upstream too. On big
> rebuilds (like libpng, gcc46) it needs to be patched; anyway usually I copy
> the patches from others distro.
>
> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but
> if you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.
Maybe we could follow the kdelibs from Trinity [1]. I have no experience with
this project, but they seems to be active. Or at least their svn repos [2]
could be searched to find useful patches.
Am 18.07.2011 12:25, schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault:
>> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but
>> if you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.
>
> Maybe we could follow the kdelibs from Trinity [1]. I have no experience with
> this project, but they seems to be active. Or at least their svn repos [2]
> could be searched to find useful patches.
>
> Stéphane
>
> [1] http://www.trinitydesktop.org/
> [2] http://websvn.kde.org/branches/trinity/kdelibs/
>
This sounds like a good idea, better than trying to build the broken
kdelibs3 code like we do now.