FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-13-2011, 08:26 PM
Eric Bélanger
 
Default

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2011 16:12:24 Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> I am maintaining qalculate-kde and would like to keep it in extra. I
>> prefer it over qalculate-gtk and it seems logical to keep
>> qalculate-kde along with qalculate-gtk and libqalculate in extra. Why
>> do you want to move kdelibs3 to community? If it's because it's
>> orphaned, I can adopt it and qt3 as well. *I suppose they are low
>> maintenance.
> Yes, that's the problem: too low maintainance from upstream too. On big
> rebuilds (like libpng, gcc46) it needs to be patched; anyway usually I copy
> the patches from others distro.
>
> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but if
> you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.
>

I've adopted kdelib3, qt3 and qt3-doc. They'll all stay in [extra].


> --
> Andrea
>
 
Old 07-14-2011, 01:41 AM
Buddhika Kurera
 
Default

Hello Fellow Design Team mates,
We have following requests from the FUDcon Pune, organizers.They have opened 3 tickets at the moment and out of them 2 has been already accepted.But if you are interested please speck out, we prefer more design concepts rather than having one.

Tshirt Design*https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/191
Posterhttps://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/192

Booklethttps://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/193
If you are interested please go ahead and accept them, I ll keep constant communication with*
you all to ensure that the materials can be delivered on time. Thanks for the time.
See you soon, Keep In touch.
--
Regards,Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera
Fedora Ambassador Sri LankaEvent*Liaison*- Design Team



_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
 
Old 07-14-2011, 03:25 AM
 
Default

Hi are you doing good? You must read this story! I bought a new car with my first check from for this company. It would be a shame to pass up this opportunity! http://bit.ly/nu8tQC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: F4.87.03893.F816E1E4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com">http://lists.debian.org/F4.87.03893.F816E1E4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com
 
Old 07-15-2011, 12:00 PM
Roland Schwingel
 
Default

Hi.....



Finally I got it *I don't know
whether I did it the fully correct way, but it works now.

I found that this mysterious replica
id 3 was stored in dse.ldif of my server-b:



To recap my scenario:





* * * server A * * < ----- * * *
server B * * * * * <-----> * *
* *server C * * * * * *----->
* *server D

(dedicated Consumer) * * (multiple Master replica ID:1) *
*(multiple Master replica ID:2) *(Dedicated Consumer)




I wanted to promote my server D to become
a multiple master - but it did not work.



What did I do to get it going:



1. Removed all replication agreements
to/from server D.

2. Stopped all LDAP services on all
servers (I was a little desperate)

3. Found replica id 3 in dse.ldif of
server B(?) - nowhere else (why B and not C?)

4. Removed these bogus entries.

5. Restarted all LDAP services on all
machines.

6. ldapsearch on server C still revealed
the bogus replica id 3 (Where the heck is that cached?).

7. Reinitialized consumer server C from
server B and restarted ldap on server C.

8. ldapsearch was clean by then.

9. removed my suffix on server D and
removed changelog.

10. recreated suffix on server D and
made server D a dedicated consumer

11. on server C created replication
agreement to server D

12. initialized server D from server
C.

13, Enabled changelog on server D

14. Changed server D to be Multiple
Master with replica id 3

15, Created replication aggreement to
server C from server D.

16. Worked. Restarted LDAP on server
D and C.

17. Still works and replicates to all
other machines along the path.

18. I need vacation....



Holy Moly!



Roland



__________________



Hi Reinhard,



Thanks for your reply!!





389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on
14.07.2011 16:25:10:



> From: Reinhard Nappert <rnappert@juniper.net>

> To: "General discussion list for the 389
Directory server project."

> <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>

> Date: 14.07.2011 16:28

> Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication trouble
when promoting

> dedicated Consumer to Multiple master

> Sent by: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org

>

> Do a * ldapsearch -b 'nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-

> ffffffff,dc=mydomain,dc=com' -D <directory manager> -w <password>
-s

> base objectclass=nstombstone

> *

> This gives you all the configured (history) of
replication ids. The

> following is the output in my setup.

> *

> dn: nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,o=base

> objectClass: top

> objectClass: nsTombstone

> objectClass: extensibleobject

> nsds50ruv: {replicageneration} 4df7a107000000010000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 1 ldap://yale:389} 4df7a396000000010000 4e19ad950000000100

> *00

> nsds50ruv: {replica 3 ldap://norquay:389} 4df7a39d000000030000 4e1605650000000

> *30000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 4 ldap://mustrum:389} 4df7a3a0000000040000 4dfb93650000000

> *40000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 2 ldap://louise:389} 4df7a39a000000020000 4e171a0700000002

> *0000

> o: base

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 1 ldap://yale:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 3 ldap://norquay:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 4 ldap://mustrum:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 2 ldap://louise:389} 00000000

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * /

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *|

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * *replication-id

> *

I issued that command on my server Server
C. I get the following results:



# extended LDIF

#

# LDAPv3

# base <nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,dc=mydomain,dc=com>
with scope baseObject

# filter: objectclass=nstombstone

# requesting: ALL

#



# ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,
mydomain.com

dn: nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,
dc=mydomain,dc=com

objectClass: top

objectClass: nsTombstone

objectClass: extensibleobject

nsds50ruv: {replicageneration} 4bf162c6000000010000

nsds50ruv: {replica 2 ldap://server-c.mydomain.com:389}
4cd3fa1e00000002

*0000 4e1ef45b000000020000

nsds50ruv: {replica 3 ldap://server-d.mydomain.de:389}

nsds50ruv: {replica 1 ldap://server-b.mydomain.de:389}
4bf16732000000010

*000 4e1ffa3e000000010000

dc: mydomain

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 2
ldap://server-c.mydomain.com:389} 4

*e1ef445

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 3
ldap://server-d.mydomain.de:389} 00000000

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 1
ldap://server-b.mydomain.de:389} 4e

*1ffa26



# search result

search: 2

result: 0 Success



# numResponses: 2

# numEntries: 1



When I look at it I see that replica id 3 is assigned
to my server-d

(which should get that replica id). I started over
deleted my server-d

assigned it replica id 4 but nothing changes.



I also cannot get rid of the informations for server-d
in that nsuniqueid

how can I do that?



Thanks,



Roland

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 07-15-2011, 12:00 PM
Roland Schwingel
 
Default

Hi.....



Finally I got it *I don't know
whether I did it the fully correct way, but it works now.

I found that this mysterious replica
id 3 was stored in dse.ldif of my server-b:



To recap my scenario:





* * * server A * * < ----- * * *
server B * * * * * <-----> * *
* *server C * * * * * *----->
* *server D

(dedicated Consumer) * * (multiple Master replica ID:1) *
*(multiple Master replica ID:2) *(Dedicated Consumer)




I wanted to promote my server D to become
a multiple master - but it did not work.



What did I do to get it going:



1. Removed all replication agreements
to/from server D.

2. Stopped all LDAP services on all
servers (I was a little desperate)

3. Found replica id 3 in dse.ldif of
server B(?) - nowhere else (why B and not C?)

4. Removed these bogus entries.

5. Restarted all LDAP services on all
machines.

6. ldapsearch on server C still revealed
the bogus replica id 3 (Where the heck is that cached?).

7. Reinitialized consumer server C from
server B and restarted ldap on server C.

8. ldapsearch was clean by then.

9. removed my suffix on server D and
removed changelog.

10. recreated suffix on server D and
made server D a dedicated consumer

11. on server C created replication
agreement to server D

12. initialized server D from server
C.

13, Enabled changelog on server D

14. Changed server D to be Multiple
Master with replica id 3

15, Created replication aggreement to
server C from server D.

16. Worked. Restarted LDAP on server
D and C.

17. Still works and replicates to all
other machines along the path.

18. I need vacation....



Holy Moly!



Roland



__________________



Hi Reinhard,



Thanks for your reply!!





389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on
14.07.2011 16:25:10:



> From: Reinhard Nappert <rnappert@juniper.net>

> To: "General discussion list for the 389
Directory server project."

> <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>

> Date: 14.07.2011 16:28

> Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication trouble
when promoting

> dedicated Consumer to Multiple master

> Sent by: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org

>

> Do a * ldapsearch -b 'nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-

> ffffffff,dc=mydomain,dc=com' -D <directory manager> -w <password>
-s

> base objectclass=nstombstone

> *

> This gives you all the configured (history) of
replication ids. The

> following is the output in my setup.

> *

> dn: nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,o=base

> objectClass: top

> objectClass: nsTombstone

> objectClass: extensibleobject

> nsds50ruv: {replicageneration} 4df7a107000000010000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 1 ldap://yale:389} 4df7a396000000010000 4e19ad950000000100

> *00

> nsds50ruv: {replica 3 ldap://norquay:389} 4df7a39d000000030000 4e1605650000000

> *30000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 4 ldap://mustrum:389} 4df7a3a0000000040000 4dfb93650000000

> *40000

> nsds50ruv: {replica 2 ldap://louise:389} 4df7a39a000000020000 4e171a0700000002

> *0000

> o: base

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 1 ldap://yale:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 3 ldap://norquay:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 4 ldap://mustrum:389} 00000000

> nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 2 ldap://louise:389} 00000000

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * /

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *|

> * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * *replication-id

> *

I issued that command on my server Server
C. I get the following results:



# extended LDIF

#

# LDAPv3

# base <nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,dc=mydomain,dc=com>
with scope baseObject

# filter: objectclass=nstombstone

# requesting: ALL

#



# ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,
mydomain.com

dn: nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff,
dc=mydomain,dc=com

objectClass: top

objectClass: nsTombstone

objectClass: extensibleobject

nsds50ruv: {replicageneration} 4bf162c6000000010000

nsds50ruv: {replica 2 ldap://server-c.mydomain.com:389}
4cd3fa1e00000002

*0000 4e1ef45b000000020000

nsds50ruv: {replica 3 ldap://server-d.mydomain.de:389}

nsds50ruv: {replica 1 ldap://server-b.mydomain.de:389}
4bf16732000000010

*000 4e1ffa3e000000010000

dc: mydomain

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 2
ldap://server-c.mydomain.com:389} 4

*e1ef445

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 3
ldap://server-d.mydomain.de:389} 00000000

nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 1
ldap://server-b.mydomain.de:389} 4e

*1ffa26



# search result

search: 2

result: 0 Success



# numResponses: 2

# numEntries: 1



When I look at it I see that replica id 3 is assigned
to my server-d

(which should get that replica id). I started over
deleted my server-d

assigned it replica id 4 but nothing changes.



I also cannot get rid of the informations for server-d
in that nsuniqueid

how can I do that?



Thanks,



Roland

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 07-16-2011, 02:01 AM
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
 
Default

On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:07 -0400, DV wrote:
> I would try the bios setting AHCI (vs. compatibility mode) if you have it.
>
> http://www.911cd.net/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t23099.html
>
> This is the SATA Advanced Host Controller Interface:
>
> http://www.techmetica.com/howto/sata-ahci-mode-bios-setting.-what-does-it-do/

I have all of the SATA channels set to AHCI mode, which includes the
Pioneer burner. I was thinking that maybe I should try changing the
BIOS setting to IDE, but then tossed it aside as crazy talk.

After your email, I decided to change the DVDRW drive's SATA channel to
IDE mode. Bingo! The CentOS 6 DVD booted. I have CentOS 6 running and
fully updated now.

I haven't looked into why the SATA Pioneer DVDRW needed AHCI disabled in
order to boot off the CentOS 6 DVD. Since the Fedora 15 DVD booted
without issue, I can only surmise isolinux in CentOS 6 and in Fedora 15
behave differently.

Thanks to everyone that tried to help out. I appreciate everyone's
efforts.

Regards,

Ranbir

--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:18:37 up 12:07, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.16, 0.08


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 07-16-2011, 05:11 AM
Arun Khan
 
Default

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
<m3freak@thesandhufamily.ca> wrote:

..................

> I have all of the SATA channels set to AHCI mode, which includes the
> Pioneer burner. *I was thinking that maybe I should try changing the
> BIOS setting to IDE, but then tossed it aside as crazy talk.
>
> After your email, I decided to change the DVDRW drive's SATA channel to
> IDE mode. *Bingo! The CentOS 6 DVD booted. *I have CentOS 6 running and
> fully updated now.
>
> I haven't looked into why the SATA Pioneer DVDRW needed AHCI disabled in
> order to boot off the CentOS 6 DVD. Since the Fedora 15 DVD booted
> without issue, I can only surmise isolinux in CentOS 6 and in Fedora 15
> behave differently.

Hmm. I am facing an unrelated problem [1] but the root cause could be
similar to your problem. I'll try changing SATA from "enhanced" to
"legacy" mode.


[1] Linux Mint Debian Edition installs successfully, BIOS is able to
see the hard drive but complaints there is no boot disk!

--
Arun Khan
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 07-17-2011, 05:45 AM
yu huang
 
Default

http://nicherry.byethost7.com/oscommerce//images/tubyus.htm

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:25 AM
Stéphane Gaudreault
 
Default

Le 13 juillet 2011 22:16:35 Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
> On Wednesday 13 July 2011 16:12:24 Eric Bélanger wrote:
> > I am maintaining qalculate-kde and would like to keep it in extra. I
> > prefer it over qalculate-gtk and it seems logical to keep
> > qalculate-kde along with qalculate-gtk and libqalculate in extra. Why
> > do you want to move kdelibs3 to community? If it's because it's
> > orphaned, I can adopt it and qt3 as well. I suppose they are low
> > maintenance.
>
> Yes, that's the problem: too low maintainance from upstream too. On big
> rebuilds (like libpng, gcc46) it needs to be patched; anyway usually I copy
> the patches from others distro.
>
> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but
> if you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.

Maybe we could follow the kdelibs from Trinity [1]. I have no experience with
this project, but they seems to be active. Or at least their svn repos [2]
could be searched to find useful patches.

Stéphane

[1] http://www.trinitydesktop.org/
[2] http://websvn.kde.org/branches/trinity/kdelibs/
 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:36 AM
Thomas Bächler
 
Default

Am 18.07.2011 12:25, schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault:
>> Sergej offers to maintain it so I thought we can move it in [community], but
>> if you are interested you can adopt qt3 and kdelibs3.
>
> Maybe we could follow the kdelibs from Trinity [1]. I have no experience with
> this project, but they seems to be active. Or at least their svn repos [2]
> could be searched to find useful patches.
>
> Stéphane
>
> [1] http://www.trinitydesktop.org/
> [2] http://websvn.kde.org/branches/trinity/kdelibs/
>

This sounds like a good idea, better than trying to build the broken
kdelibs3 code like we do now.
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org