FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-30-2011, 05:15 PM
ken
 
Default

On 06/30/2011 11:57 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> ken wrote:
>> # wget
>> http://ftp.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/CentOS/5.6/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-58.el5_6.4.i386.rpm
>> --2011-06-30 11:35:44--
>> http://ftp.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/CentOS/5.6/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-58.el5_6.4.i386.rpm
>> Resolving ftp.linux.ncsu.edu... 152.1.2.172
>> Connecting to ftp.linux.ncsu.edu|152.1.2.172|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>> Length: 17244521 (16M) [application/octet-stream]
>> Saving to: `glibc-common-2.5-58.el5_6.4.i386.rpm'
>>
>> 5% [=> ] 1,029,216 --.-K/s eta 23m 10s
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> and just freeze there... except the right two numbers (following "eta")
>> will continue to climb higher... it stays at "5%" and "1,029,216"
>> doesn't change, and there's no activity between those two numbers. In
>> short, the download just stops or freezes.
>>
>
> Have you checked your network interface on your network connection in
> general? First try the same PC in different network environment (home,
> another location?) and then try to setup another PC with the same IP in
> the same network environment as original PC.
>
> Ljubomir
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


In the last half hour I successfully used yum to download and install
strace, krb5-workstation and krb5-libs... for this and other reasons I'm
pretty sure I don't have a network problem. yum and wget and ftp all
seem to have a problem downloading
glibc-common-2.5-58.el5_6.4.i386.rpm... perhaps because it's rather
large (16M), or simply larger than 1M. But then I was able to ftp one
file which was 5M.

Ljubomir, you are correct in that it's some kind of network problem--
well, it could have something to do with limits or some extra-weird
permissions thing I don't know about. You'll see I've amended the
Subject line to indicate it's probably a network problem.


So, shifting into work-around mode... I used wget to download
glibc-common (the troublesome file) to another machine. No problem.
Then I scp'd it to the problem machine-- again no problem-- and
successfully installed it there using rpm.


Now that everything's been upgraded, the urgency has gone out of the
situation. I had thought to use strace and/or tcpdump as was suggested
(thanks for those suggestions), but I've found those utilities give a
lot of output and take a lot of time to analyze (for me anyway). With
other things I need to get to today, I'll be saving those small projects
for another day.

But just one other quick test: I used scp on the problem box to download
that same glibc-common rpm file from the local machine (residing on the
same LAN and in the same network block) mentioned above. It worked
fine, even downloading to the same directory (/tmp). And, yes, rpm
verified that the file was complete and uncorrupted. This narrows the
problem down to a couple pockets.

If I find anything more, I'll post back.


Thanks for all the suggestions, everyone.

--
"When a society comes together and makes decisions in harmony,
when it respects its most noble traditions, cares for its most
vulnerable members, treats its forests and lands with respect,
then it will prosper and not decline."
--Buddha, Mahaparinirvana Sutra
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 06-30-2011, 05:29 PM
 
Default

ken wrote:
<snip>
> So, shifting into work-around mode... I used wget to download
> glibc-common (the troublesome file) to another machine. No problem.
> Then I scp'd it to the problem machine-- again no problem-- and
> successfully installed it there using rpm.

A strong recommendation: rpm -e, then yum localinstall. That way, yum's
d/b will be correct.

mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 06-30-2011, 05:43 PM
ken
 
Default

On 06/30/2011 01:29 PM m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
> ken wrote:
> <snip>
>> So, shifting into work-around mode... I used wget to download
>> glibc-common (the troublesome file) to another machine. No problem.
>> Then I scp'd it to the problem machine-- again no problem-- and
>> successfully installed it there using rpm.
>
> A strong recommendation: rpm -e, then yum localinstall. That way, yum's
> d/b will be correct.
>
> mark

It's not necessary. When I do "yum update" now (after having installed
five packages using rpm), yum confirms "No packages marked for Update".

...which is nice.

--
"When a society comes together and makes decisions in harmony,
when it respects its most noble traditions, cares for its most
vulnerable members, treats its forests and lands with respect,
then it will prosper and not decline."
--Buddha, Mahaparinirvana Sutra
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 06-30-2011, 07:07 PM
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
 
Default

m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
> ken wrote:
> <snip>
>> So, shifting into work-around mode... I used wget to download
>> glibc-common (the troublesome file) to another machine. No problem.
>> Then I scp'd it to the problem machine-- again no problem-- and
>> successfully installed it there using rpm.
>
> A strong recommendation: rpm -e, then yum localinstall. That way, yum's
> d/b will be correct.

yum doesn't have a db of installed packages, it relies on rpm for that.
(fortunately!!)

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 06-30-2011, 09:09 PM
"David C. Rankin"
 
Default

On 06/30/2011 09:25 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:

On 06/29/2011 02:46 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:

Hi,

Am 29.06.2011 21:25, schrieb David C. Rankin:

is part of it in xulrunner

xulrunner isn't needed anymore, when I remember it right.

What kind of security do you have on your mail server? Maybe there is a
problem with certificate(s), or something like this.



I hate to admit it, but this ISP has no security - it's "plain". So that might
be confusing the smarter apps looking for a cert??




I can't explain it. I dropped back to tty1 and updated to tbird 5 again and
this time all the pop accounts are working. I don't know what happened with
the last update. The only difference this time was I exited the desktop before
updating. It makes no sense, but whatever didn't work with the last install
seems to be working fine now. Thanks for your thoughts and feedback letting me
know it was working for you.


--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
 
Old 06-30-2011, 09:23 PM
"David C. Rankin"
 
Default

On 06/30/2011 04:09 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:

On 06/30/2011 09:25 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:

On 06/29/2011 02:46 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:

Hi,

Am 29.06.2011 21:25, schrieb David C. Rankin:

is part of it in xulrunner

xulrunner isn't needed anymore, when I remember it right.

What kind of security do you have on your mail server? Maybe there is a
problem with certificate(s), or something like this.



I hate to admit it, but this ISP has no security - it's "plain". So that might
be confusing the smarter apps looking for a cert??




I can't explain it. I dropped back to tty1 and updated to tbird 5 again and
this time all the pop accounts are working. I don't know what happened with
the last update. The only difference this time was I exited the desktop before
updating. It makes no sense, but whatever didn't work with the last install
seems to be working fine now. Thanks for your thoughts and feedback letting me
know it was working for you.



Aargh!

This is frustrating. On initial start, tbird 5 seems to check my accounts
just fine, but when attempting a manual mail check, I get the following error:


Sending of password did not succeed. Mail server pop.suddenlinkmail.com
responded: please send PASS command


Anybody know why this would happen? What to check? It is repeatable every
time. I'll wireshark the communication and see if that help...



--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
 
Old 06-30-2011, 09:31 PM
"David C. Rankin"
 
Default

On 06/30/2011 04:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
<snip>


Aargh!

This is frustrating. On initial start, tbird 5 seems to check my accounts just
fine, but when attempting a manual mail check, I get the following error:

Sending of password did not succeed. Mail server pop.suddenlinkmail.com
responded: please send PASS command

Anybody know why this would happen? What to check? It is repeatable every
time. I'll wireshark the communication and see if that help...




Hmm..

This seems intermittent. It happens, then it doesn't happen. When the pop
account succeeds, It works like it should:


0040 2d 90 2b 4f 4b 20 70 6c 65 61 73 65 20 73 65 6e -.+OK pl ease sen
0050 64 20 50 41 53 53 20 63 6f 6d 6d 61 6e 64 0d 0a d PASS c ommand..

I'll keep trying to capture the failure and try and figure out exactly
where it is failing. Murphy's law - with wireshark running -- the login works



--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
 
Old 07-01-2011, 10:18 AM
murat gülerci
 
Default

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 07-01-2011, 10:22 AM
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
 
Default

I received about 20 "Delivery Status Notification(Failure)" from
address: juan.cardoza at - telcel-blackberry-net


stating he has not received mails I posted to this mailing list.

Can someone remove or disable him from this list since he's obviously
not receiving any mail.


Ljubomir

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 05:00:32 GMT
From: postmaster@telcel.blackberry.net
To: office@plnet.rs

Your message:
To: juan.cardoza@telcel.blackberry.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup
Sent Date: Wed Jun 22 17:44:09 2011 +0000
has not been delivered to the recipient's BlackBerry Handheld.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 07-01-2011, 02:56 PM
Máirín Duffy
 
Default

Hi Samuele,

> Let me know something I don't receive anything about.

The following was sent to this list two days ago:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Maria Gracia Leandro Lombardo <tatica@fedoraproject.org>
Reply-to: Fedora Design Team <design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To: Fedora Design Team <design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Design-team] Volunteer needed: events liasion?
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:17:58 +0000

Hey awesome!!!

to talk about FUDcon EMEA artwork please join me this friday at 15UTC ,
irc.freenode #Fudcon-Planning

What we are doing I think can be done for all Fudcons, is a schedule
with variable dates that can be adjusted to any event, and will help a
lot to guide designer to have everything in time. Is not done, but as
I'm withot interne tI wil try to finish it for this friday meeting





--
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica
LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56

_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team______________________________________________ _
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org