FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-23-2011, 01:08 AM
Stephen John Smoogen
 
Default

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 18:53, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 07:44:35 pm Nick Bebout wrote:
>> I committed this as an "emergency", since root@redhat was getting about
>> 20-30 emails per minute
>>

> i question why root@redhat.com was getting mail for l10n-admin-
> members@fedoraproject.org
>
> sounds like something is not setup right somewhere

several people on l10n-admin send to redhat.com addresses. I am
guessing RH's graylists or something and we spewed a ton of bounces
and then bounces to the bounces and then...

> Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>



--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 02-23-2011, 01:12 AM
Mark Chappell
 
Default

On 23 February 2011 02:53, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us> wrote:
> i question why root@redhat.com was getting mail for l10n-admin-
> members@fedoraproject.org
>
> sounds like something is not setup right somewhere

Because the headers on the email were a mess, which meant the bounce
email bounced which bounced as well and eventually ended up sent off
to the Red Hat servers.


Mark
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 02-23-2011, 02:02 AM
Dennis Gilmore
 
Default

On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 07:56:03 pm Nick Bebout wrote:
> The last two patches should fix the root cause of the spams, and extra
> space before except and pass.
>
> I applied these as "emergency" patches also, to avoid flooding root@redhat
> with like ~20-30 errors per minute
>
> Nick
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> Subject: [puppet] Fix more indenting
> From: "Nick Bebout" <nb@fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Tue, February 22, 2011 7:51 pm
> To: sysadmin-members@fedoraproject.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit da94ee041dfe914c90669365feac08c03f1302a6
> Author: Nick Bebout <nb@puppet01.phx2.fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Wed Feb 23 01:51:00 2011 +0000
>
> Fix more indenting
>
> .../hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> ---
> diff --git a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> index 02bf8e1..e26751e 100644
> --- a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> +++ b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ def login(request,
> template_name='simpleauth/signin.html'): try:
> request.user.message_set.create(
> message=_("Login is disabled due to migration to
> fedora.transifex.net."))
> - except:
> + except:
> pass
> return HttpResponseRedirect(reverse('transifex.home'))
> # next = clean_next(request.GET.get('next'))
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
+1
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 02-23-2011, 03:42 AM
Toshio Kuratomi
 
Default

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:02:37PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 07:56:03 pm Nick Bebout wrote:
> > The last two patches should fix the root cause of the spams, and extra
> > space before except and pass.
> >
> > I applied these as "emergency" patches also, to avoid flooding root@redhat
> > with like ~20-30 errors per minute
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> > Subject: [puppet] Fix more indenting
> > From: "Nick Bebout" <nb@fedoraproject.org>
> > Date: Tue, February 22, 2011 7:51 pm
> > To: sysadmin-members@fedoraproject.org
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit da94ee041dfe914c90669365feac08c03f1302a6
> > Author: Nick Bebout <nb@puppet01.phx2.fedoraproject.org>
> > Date: Wed Feb 23 01:51:00 2011 +0000
> >
> > Fix more indenting
> >
> > .../hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > diff --git a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> > b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> > index 02bf8e1..e26751e 100644
> > --- a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> > +++ b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ def login(request,
> > template_name='simpleauth/signin.html'): try:
> > request.user.message_set.create(
> > message=_("Login is disabled due to migration to
> > fedora.transifex.net."))
> > - except:
> > + except:
> > pass
> > return HttpResponseRedirect(reverse('transifex.home'))
> > # next = clean_next(request.GET.get('next'))
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> +1

+1

Thans nb

-Toshio
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 02-23-2011, 08:59 AM
"C.Y. Ling"
 
Default

Good day,

I am Mr. C.Y. Ling, alternate CEO of the operations of CITIC Bank
International, China. I have a proposal for you in the tune of One Hundred
& Five Million EUR, after successful transfer, we shall share in the ratio
of forty for you and sixty for me. Please reply for specifics.

Yours,
Mr. C.Y. Ling.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 11:32 AM
"C.Y. Ling"
 
Default

Good day,

I am Mr. C.Y. Ling, alternate CEO of the operations of CITIC Bank
International, China. I have a proposal for you in the tune of One Hundred
& Five Million EUR, after successful transfer, we shall share in the ratio
of forty for you and sixty for me. Please reply for specifics.

Yours,
Mr. C.Y. Ling.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:12 PM
Stéphane Gaudreault
 
Default

The python 3.2 rebuild is completed. Everything that needed (and hopefully
nothing that did not...) was moved into [testing].

Thank you to everyone who helped out on this rebuild !

Stéphane
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:12 PM
Stéphane Gaudreault
 
Default

The python 3.2 rebuild is completed. Everything that needed (and hopefully
nothing that did not...) was moved into [testing].

Thank you to everyone who helped out on this rebuild !

Stéphane
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:38 PM
"David C. Rankin"
 
Default

On 02/22/2011 06:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was also the
> only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, there are other
> distros using that patch without reported issue and it is now in glibc mainline
> so nothing is obviously wrong with it. Also, I have had no other crash reports
> since this update...
>
>
> I just looked back through this thread and your backtraces are all over the
> place. First it was an issue with libxcb, and then on a different VM it is
> somewhere completely different. What is difference across your VMs that you
> get consistent crashes in one but not the other?
>
> Allan

The basic x86_64 Arch VMs are the SAME VM, just moved from one box to the other
(one on my laptop copied from my backup server where it was originally
installed). The packages are identical on the VMs except on the first I had
rebuilt libxcb and glibc with options(!strip) and CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -g".

I will rebuild Trinity and update both VMs and then give updated .kcrashes for
each. If 2.13-3 works fine and 2.13-4 causes the crash, it just points to some
unintended consequence in the update. I'll rebuild, update both and report back.
But if Baho is also seeing something -- the plot thickens.

--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 09:20 PM
"John R. Dennison"
 
Default

Mr. Stevens,

I feel I owe you, and the list membership, a public retraction and
apology for this message. It was uncalled for, and went far beyond even
my normal abrasive self. Please accept my sincere apologies for my tone
and insinuations; I assure you it will not happen again.





John R. Dennison
Principle
Gerdesas Systems

----- Forwarded message from "John R. Dennison" <jrd@gerdesas.com> -----

> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:17:29 -0600
> From: "John R. Dennison" <jrd@gerdesas.com>
> To: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@imt-systems.com>
> Cc: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel@centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress?
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:56:12AM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
>
> > Just take the missing build dependencies from Fedora 12/13. Red Hat
> > has probably done the same.
>
> "Just", "probably". Do these types of guessing games work out
> well for you in your professional life?
>
> > What are you waiting for @ CentOS team??? Until Red Hat released the
> > missing build dependencies?
>
> Do you wake up in the morning thinking of how you can be the
> most selfish, arrogant and entitled jerk possible or is it
> something that comes to you on the spur of the moment?
>
> > Then you can probably wait a long time.
>
> It's a shame that releases can't be done in a fully selective
> manner; if so I would plead with and bribe, if necessary, the
> CentOS developers to release to everyone *except* you.
>
> Here's a thought for you:
>
> How about you no longer comment in a project DEVELOPMENT channel
> on those subjects you aren't technically proficient enough to
> understand? Even better, how about you just go away? Go use
> another distro or attempt to build your own or buy Redhat or
> whatever you choose to do; it's quite apparent you aren't happy
> here and you likely won't ever be so go try something else.

----- End forwarded message -----

--
"My other computer is your windows box."

-- Ralf Hildebrandt
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org