Hi,

There's a package in natty with typoed Original-Maintainer. Could
someone look into that, and fix that?

thanks

- Lucas

----- Forwarded message from Universal Debian DB role account <udd@samosa.debian.org> -----

[Sources] Unknown key Originial-Maintainer appeared 1 times
[Packages] Unknown key Originial-Maintainer appeared 4 times

----- End forwarded message -----

--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

2011/1/14 Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>:
> There's a package in natty with typoed Original-Maintainer. Could
> someone look into that, and fix that?

Fixed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apf/0.8.4-1ubuntu2

--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

This message is targeted for sage-mathematics users.
If you have a chance, please try sage-mathematics in [community-testing].
This is a new release with a few failed automated unit tests, but a
few are usually expected. Please let me know if you have any troubles
when using the new version. Otherwise I will move it to [community]
this afternoon.

Cheers!

On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 12:52 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> This message is targeted for sage-mathematics users.
> If you have a chance, please try sage-mathematics in [community-testing].
> This is a new release with a few failed automated unit tests, but a
> few are usually expected. Please let me know if you have any troubles
> when using the new version. Otherwise I will move it to [community]
> this afternoon.
>
> Cheers!

Any specific things we need to look for?


--
Jelle van der Waa

Signoff both architectures :-D

P.S. I apologize if this actually starts a new thread on the mailing
list. I wasn't subscribed to arch-general when you sent this message.

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 12:52 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> This message is targeted for sage-mathematics users.
>> If you have a chance, please try sage-mathematics in [community-testing].
>> This is a new release with a few failed automated unit tests, but a
>> few are usually expected. Please let me know if you have any troubles
>> when using the new version. Otherwise I will move it to [community]
>> this afternoon.
>>
>> Cheers!
>
> Any specific things we need to look for?
>
>
> --
> Jelle van der Waa
>
>

Not really, just try out some functions you use regularly.

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 12:52 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>> This message is targeted for sage-mathematics users.
>>> If you have a chance, please try sage-mathematics in [community-testing].
>>> This is a new release with a few failed automated unit tests, but a
>>> few are usually expected. Please let me know if you have any troubles
>>> when using the new version. Otherwise I will move it to [community]
>>> this afternoon.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>
>> Any specific things we need to look for?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jelle van der Waa
>>
>>
>
> Not really, just try out some functions you use regularly.
>

Moved sage-mathematics to community, thanks for all the testing.

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us> wrote:
> Signoff both architectures :-D
>
> P.S. I apologize if this actually starts a new thread on the mailing
> list. I wasn't subscribed to arch-general when you sent this message.
>

and it did

Hi Jelle,

> All removed, pfft that was time consuming..

Thank you for your efforts.


> Could you prevent your script to upload these packages and the ones
> in [community] etc. IIRC you are from the archhaskell team

Yes, of course. These uploads are performed manually, by the way. There
is no script doing that, which is probably the main reason why these
kind of mistakes happen occasionally. Scripts wouldn't make those
mistakes, but humans do. Anyway, we try hard not to.

Take care,
Peter

I agree with this decision by you, but I suggest we keep policy in the
habs/README.md file. Would you mind updating it to reflect that we won't
package newer versions of packages which are bundled with GHC?

/M

On 16/01/11 16:50, Peter Simons wrote:
> The following packages are provided by extra/ghc, but they are also on AUR:
>
> |--------------------------+--------|
> | Package Name | AUR ID |
> |--------------------------+--------|
> | haskell-array | 21716 |
> | haskell-bytestring | 17970 |
> | haskell-cabal | 25443 |
> | haskell-containers | 19697 |
> | haskell-directory | 25399 |
> | haskell-filepath | 21717 |
> | haskell-haskell98 | 19698 |
> | haskell-hpc | 17922 |
> | haskell-old-locale | 21718 |
> | haskell-old-time | 25400 |
> | haskell-pretty | 21720 |
> | haskell-process | 21465 |
> | haskell-random | 21721 |
> | haskell-syb | 21263 |
> | haskell-template-haskell | 19699 |
> | haskell-time | 17900 |
> | haskell-unix | 21722 |
> | haddock | 7651 |
> |--------------------------+--------|
>
> That is probably not a good idea. Could someone please delete those
> packages from AUR?
>
> Take care,
> Peter

--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus