FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-08-2010, 10:42 AM
norberto alvarez
 
Default

http://rolandobruno.com.ar/lo.ve.php




--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 11-08-2010, 01:38 PM
Maximilian Bräutigam
 
Default

Am 08.11.2010 13:04, schrieb Alex Schuster:
> Maximilian Bräutigam writes:
>
>> I'm trying to update my glibc for now 2 weeks or so and it doesn't
>> matter what I'm doing, I run into a strange error.
>>
>> """
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
>> nux-gnu-nptl/libc_pic.a(init-first.os).data+0x0): multiple definition
>> of `__libc_multiple_libcs'
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
>> nux-gnu-nptl/elf/dl-allobjs.os.bss+0xe8): first defined here
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
>> nux-gnu-nptl/libc_pic.a(dl-addr.os): In function
>> `_dl_addr_inside_object':
>> dl-addr.c.text+0x0): multiple definition of `_dl_addr_inside_object'
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
>> nux-gnu-nptl/elf/dl-allobjs.os.text+0x11260): first defined here
>> collect2: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück
>> [...]
>
>
>> I tried many things like: playing with cflags "-fstack-protector",
>
> Hmm, does this mean you removed -fstack-protector?
>
>> downgrading gcc from 4.4.5 to 4.4.4, recompiling DEPEND packages and
>> later hole @system. To my mind it is not a bug of glibc, at least I
>> didn't find anything appropiate at bugs.gentoo.org and on another
>> machine in office it's compiling w/o errors.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332823 says that -fstack-protector
> is supported for hardened profiles only.
>
> Wonko
>

First, I didn't use it (cannot remember error), then I tried it out, and
now I removed it again and it's compiling...
Wow, thanks alot for the hint.

Kind regards,
der Max
 
Old 11-09-2010, 01:44 PM
 
Default

Hi everybody!

I am wondering if anyone of you fellows on this list has successfully
installed Crux on a Samsung NC 10 netbook? If not, have you installed it on
any other kind of netbook?

Best regards

David Lind

_______________________________________________
CRUX mailing list
CRUX@lists.crux.nu
http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
 
Old 11-09-2010, 06:59 PM
Tarball
 
Default

2010/11/8 norberto alvarez <alvarezmaizonaba@yahoo.com>:
> http://rolandobruno.com.ar/lo.ve.php

Stop spamming us, please.


--
Tarball
<74r84ll@gmail.com>

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 11-11-2010, 09:19 PM
Important Notice
 
Default

Your Email Id has won £1,000,000.00. in the Uk Award Promo. send your

Names..

Address..

Tel..
 
Old 11-12-2010, 12:07 PM
maximilian attems
 
Default

Hello Kir,

I am on list and happy to discuss anything on list.
adding d-kernel on CC to, so that everyone is informed.
Please Ola, don't send private mails for things that are not private.

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Quoting "Kir Kolyshkin" <kir@openvz.org>:
>> Ola,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for letting us know.
>>
>> Can you explain what it means "OpenVZ can't anymore do checkpointing
>> since 2.6.18".
>
> I have no clue. I was about to ask you actually if you knew anything
> about this.
> I did not attend to that meeting so I have not been part of the discussions.

It is the feedback we get from our users, adding for example
Dieter on cc.

>> Do you think I should ask Debian kernel people directly?

from several days ago, can't rephrase better:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2010/11/msg00064.html

We highly appreciate the work that was and is been done.
But newer linux-2.6 offers in tree promising virtualisations.

Also please realise that we are speaking of a linux-2.6 that
hat not yet released yet - maybe in the neighbourhood of 2.6.40
for a maybe optimistic 2012 Wheezy release.
(Squeeze is not released yet..)


--
maks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20101112130712.GG11236@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20101112130712.GG11236@vostochny.stro.at
 
Old 11-12-2010, 12:44 PM
"Ola Lundqvist"
 
Default

Hi Maximilian

Just wanted to explain why I asked you privately, and that was to
check the intention of this without starting another flamewar. :-)


Obviously I started a small flame by my intention to not start a big one ;-)

Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:

Hello Kir,

I am on list and happy to discuss anything on list.
adding d-kernel on CC to, so that everyone is informed.
Please Ola, don't send private mails for things that are not private.

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

Quoting "Kir Kolyshkin" <kir@openvz.org>:

Ola,

Thanks a lot for letting us know.

Can you explain what it means "OpenVZ can't anymore do checkpointing
since 2.6.18".


I have no clue. I was about to ask you actually if you knew anything
about this.
I did not attend to that meeting so I have not been part of the discussions.


It is the feedback we get from our users, adding for example
Dieter on cc.


Do you think I should ask Debian kernel people directly?


from several days ago, can't rephrase better:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2010/11/msg00064.html

We highly appreciate the work that was and is been done.
But newer linux-2.6 offers in tree promising virtualisations.

Also please realise that we are speaking of a linux-2.6 that
hat not yet released yet - maybe in the neighbourhood of 2.6.40
for a maybe optimistic 2012 Wheezy release.
(Squeeze is not released yet..)


My intention was to get a clarification of whether this announcement
was for the future or if it was for the nearest time.


Best regards,

// Ola



--
maks






--
--- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/ ola@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37
| opal@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20101112144439.11242sss67x0rx6o@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20101112144439.11242sss67x0rx6o@webmail.inguza.net
 
Old 11-12-2010, 12:52 PM
maximilian attems
 
Default

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> My intention was to get a clarification of whether this announcement was
> for the future or if it was for the nearest time.
>

not sure how it can be confounded with near future?
the topitem explicitly lists Wheezy as time frame.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20101112135239.GH11236@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20101112135239.GH11236@vostochny.stro.at
 
Old 11-12-2010, 01:16 PM
"Ola Lundqvist"
 
Default

Hi Maximilian.

Thanks. You have answered my question.

Now Kir and I just have to build good arguments why we should have
openvz back. :-)


Best regards,

// Ola

Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:


My intention was to get a clarification of whether this announcement was
for the future or if it was for the nearest time.



not sure how it can be confounded with near future?
the topitem explicitly lists Wheezy as time frame.






--
--- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/ ola@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37
| opal@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20101112151624.63813qxrr2qf5nb4@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20101112151624.63813qxrr2qf5nb4@webmail.inguza.net
 
Old 11-13-2010, 05:01 AM
Mike Viau
 
Default

Hello,

I am trying to re-setup my fake-raid (RAID1) volume with LVM2 like setup previously. I had been using dmraid on a Lenny installation which gave me (from memory) a block device like /dev/mapper/isw_xxxxxxxxxxx_ and also a /dev/One1TB, but have discovered that the mdadm has replaced the older and believed to be obsolete dmraid for multiple disk/raid support.

Automatically the fake-raid LVM physical volume does not seem to be set up. I believe my data is safe as I can insert a knoppix live-cd in the system and mount the fake-raid volume (and browse the files). I am planning on perhaps purchasing another at least 1TB drive to backup the data before trying to much fancy stuff with mdadm in fear of loosing the data.

A few commands that might shed more light on the situation:


pvdisplay (showing the /dev/md/[device] not recognized yet by LVM2, note sdc another single drive with LVM)

--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdc7
VG Name XENSTORE-VG
PV Size 46.56 GiB / not usable 2.00 MiB
Allocatable yes (but full)
PE Size 4.00 MiB
Total PE 11920
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 11920
PV UUID wRa8xM-lcGZ-GwLX-F6bA-YiCj-c9e1-eMpPdL


cat /proc/mdstat (showing what mdadm shows/discovers)

Personalities :
md127 : inactive sda[1](S) sdb[0](S)
4514 blocks super external:imsm

unused devices:


ls -l /dev/md/imsm0 (showing contents of /dev/md/* [currently only one file/link ])

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Nov 7 08:07 /dev/md/imsm0 -> ../md127


ls -l /dev/md127 (showing the block device)

brw-rw---- 1 root disk 9, 127 Nov 7 08:07 /dev/md127




It looks like I can not even access the md device the system created on boot.

Does anyone have a guide or tips to migrating from the older dmraid to mdadm for fake-raid?


fdisk -uc /dev/md127* (showing the block device is inaccessible)

Unable to read /dev/md127


dmesg (pieces of dmesg/booting)

[*** 4.214092] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
[*** 4.214495] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.15.0-ioctl (2009-04-01) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com
[*** 5.509386] udev[446]: starting version 163
[*** 7.181418] md: md127 stopped.
[*** 7.183088] md: bind<sdb>
[*** 7.183179] md: bind<sda>



update-initramfs -u (Perhaps the most interesting error of them all, I can confirm this occurs with a few different kernels)

update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/OneTB-RAID1-PV: No such file or directory


Revised my information, inital thread on Debian-users thread at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/11/msg01015.html

Thanks for any ones help

-M


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: BAY148-w34F1B0624B57B12374AC90EF340@phx.gbl">http://lists.debian.org/BAY148-w34F1B0624B57B12374AC90EF340@phx.gbl
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org