2010/2/4, ianux <ianux@free.fr>:
> Hi archers,
>
> I'm maintening stellarium-svn in AUR and I saw Stellarium 0.10.3 in
> [testing]. It shows qt>=4.5.1 in dependencies but this version (which
> doesn't seem to be very stable - several bugs with QT and GLSL -
> according to the mailing list) depends on qt 4.6.

Hi ianux,

Stellarium 0.10.3 in [testing] has been built against qt 4.6


--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it

Le 04/02/10, Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@archlinux.org> a écrit :


> 2010/2/4, ianux <ianux@free.fr>:
> > Hi archers,
> >
> > I'm maintening stellarium-svn in AUR and I saw Stellarium 0.10.3 in
> > [testing]. It shows qt>=4.5.1 in dependencies but this version
> > (which doesn't seem to be very stable - several bugs with QT and
> > GLSL - according to the mailing list) depends on qt 4.6.
>
> Hi ianux,
>
> Stellarium 0.10.3 in [testing] has been built against qt 4.6
>
>

yes indeed, it's mandatory to use - and compile -
stellarium 0.10.3 with qt 4.6
but packages from testing requires qt>=4.5.1, so enabling
[testing] in pacman.conf and doing pacman -S stellarium doesn't upgrade
qt since qt 4.5.3 (>=4.5.1) is already in extra, which leads to broken
binary.
I'm just saying that stellarium PKGBUILD from [testing] MUST mention
qt>=4.6

--
radio ianux - http://ianux.fr/

On 02/05/2010 12:41 AM, ianux wrote:

Le 04/02/10, Giovanni Scafora<giovanni@archlinux.org> a écrit :



2010/2/4, ianux<ianux@free.fr>:

Hi archers,

I'm maintening stellarium-svn in AUR and I saw Stellarium 0.10.3 in
[testing]. It shows qt>=4.5.1 in dependencies but this version
(which doesn't seem to be very stable - several bugs with QT and
GLSL - according to the mailing list) depends on qt 4.6.


Hi ianux,

Stellarium 0.10.3 in [testing] has been built against qt 4.6




yes indeed, it's mandatory to use - and compile -
stellarium 0.10.3 with qt 4.6
but packages from testing requires qt>=4.5.1, so enabling
[testing] in pacman.conf and doing pacman -S stellarium doesn't upgrade
qt since qt 4.5.3 (>=4.5.1) is already in extra, which leads to broken
binary.
I'm just saying that stellarium PKGBUILD from [testing] MUST mention
qt>=4.6



but still the only supported way is to fully update from testing and not
cherry picking.


--
Ionut

Can you confirm the fix from Rumko does not break your ulibc setup ?

--
cvaroqui,
http://www.opensvc.com
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,
I got no replies from Michael.
Could any DD review and upload this?

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ganymed-ssh2/ganymed-ssh2_210-3.dsc
or
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/ganymed-ssh2

Thanks,
Gabriele


- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: maven-scm, ganymed-ssh2 and maven
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:59:41 +0100
From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>
To: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>, Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>

Hi Marcus Hi Michael,

The software I'm packaging depends on maven-scm, which depends on
ganymed-ssh2,

- -
-
--maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvsjava/pom.xml
[...]
<dependency>
<groupId>ch.ethz.ganymed</groupId>
<artifactId>ganymed-ssh2</artifactId>
<version>build210</version>
</dependency>
[...]
but ganymed-ssh2 doesn't support maven and maven-scm doesn't find it.

So I did some changes to ganymed-ssh2 on svn.
Changes are:
+ * Maven integration
+ * dh compat to 7
+ * d/control:
+ - Added maven-repo-helper as Build-Depends
+ - Added ${miscepends} ad Depends
+ - Standard-Version to 3.8.3
+ - Updated Homepage field
+ - Section from libs to java

Could you please review and upload it?

Thanks,
Gabriele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktvCrEACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvPUwCcCTAk/pJc8JSCe5Vuo3hJE7cU
HsYAn3ahk3AFpRScWcqgE6qp1QKn29jY
=Km9T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

HI,

since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in evolution. Many html portions of text are replaced by [?].
Hidden text is often embedded in "span" tags.
Messages come from an exchange server but message source is valid html.




--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

The lock() macro is defined in libmultipath/lock.h and just invokes
pthread_mutex_lock() so there'll be no problem replacing the call to lock() with
a call to pthread_mutex_lock().


In the version I was patching (0.4.7) the macros were used everywhere, but in
the latest git master it looks like pthread library calls are invoked directly.
Please change it if it makes the style more consistent.


Regards,

Alex


Christophe Varoqui wrote:

Can you confirm the fix from Rumko does not break your ulibc setup ?



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:
[PATCH] Latest git -master is not compilable
From:
Rumko <rumcic@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:02:23 +0000
To:
"christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com" <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>

To:
"christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com" <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>


Hi!

In latest git -master on line 1443 of multipathd/main.c lock() is called on
exit_mutex, but since exit_mutex is a pthread_mutex_t, pthread_mutex_lock()
is needed.


Attached is the one-liner patch, tested it on a gentoo machine and seems to be
working.





--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

On Monday 01 February 2010 12:58:49 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently installing a new server and am using Linux software raid to
> merge 6 * 1.5TB drives in a RAID5 configuration.
>
> Creating the RAID5 takes over 20 hours (according to " cat /proc/mdstat ")
>
> Is there a way that will speed this up? The drives are new, but contain
> random data left over from some speed and reliability tests I did. I don't
> care about keeping the current 'data', as long as when the array is
> reliable later.
>
> Can I use the " --assume-clean " option with mdadm and then expect it to
> keep working, even through reboots?
> Or is this a really bad idea?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Joost Roeleveld
>

Hi all,

Many thanks for all the input, I did wait the 20 hours, but when it was
finished, the performance was still slow. And trying out different options for
the array didn't actually help.

Thanks to the thread "1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance
so far" I figured out the problem (4KB sectors).
After changing the partitions to use sector 64 as start (as opposed to 63) a
build of the array should only take 6 hours.
Hopefully, the raid-array will also show a better performance when this is
finished.

--
Joost Roeleveld

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Zacharie Elcor wrote:
> HI,
>
> since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in
> evolution. Many html portions of text are replaced by [?].
> Hidden text is often embedded in "span" tags.
> Messages come from an exchange server but message source is valid
> html.
>
>

Havwe you checked your HTML configuration in Mail Preferences set
correctly?
--
================================================== =====================
Computers are unreliable, but humans are even more unreliable. Any
system which depends on human reliability is unreliable. -- Gilb
================================================== =====================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@sbcglobal.net

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Aaron Konstam <akonstam@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Zacharie Elcor wrote:

> HI,

>

> since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in

> evolution. Many html portions of text are replaced by [?].

> Hidden text is often embedded in "span" tags.

> Messages come from an exchange server but message source is valid

> html.

>

>



Havwe you checked your HTML configuration in Mail Preferences set

correctly?

yes, HTML mode is set to "Show HTML if present". Didn't find any other relevant option.



--

================================================== =====================

Computers are unreliable, but humans are even more unreliable. Any

system which depends on human reliability is unreliable. -- Gilb

================================================== =====================

Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@sbcglobal.net



--

users mailing list

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines