-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack Transport improvements
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:48:54 +0100
From: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@gmail.com>
CC: jack-devel@lists.jackaudio.org
References: <4B3DF929.6050001@gmail.com>
<201001041845.18992.termtech@rogers.com>
<201001051053.23904.geoff@laughingboyrecords.com >
<201001041900.12530.termtech@rogers.com>
<alpine.DEB.1.10.1001041905210.11093@localhost.loc aldomain>
<caa95e271001042316t3b38a27dp4ce9648f46e06a7f@mail .gmail.com>
<eb4b5e1d1001050417v1defd901sd0b41232a2044b44@mail .gmail.com>
Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:16 AM, alex stone <compose59@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gabriel, a question. How difficult would it be to introduce a coded
>> function in each jack app that "talks" to other apps, so each client
>> is aware of other clients, timewise, outside of mmc, mtc, etc.....
>>
>> So for example, Ardour is aware of Hydrogen, Rosegarden is aware of
>> Ardour and Hydrogen, etc...
>>
>> Would this improve timesync and variable tempo markings, and enable a
>> "true" sync between apps?
>>
>
>
> add to that a looping implementation like the one proposed by jesse
> chappell years ago, and you're good to go.
>
Is that proposal of Jesse Chappell online somewhere?
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack Transport improvements
> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:04:56 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabriel@teuton.org>
> To: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@gmail.com>
> CC: jack-devel@lists.jackaudio.org
> References: <4B3DF929.6050001@gmail.com>
> <201001041845.18992.termtech@rogers.com>
> <201001051053.23904.geoff@laughingboyrecords.com >
> <201001041900.12530.termtech@rogers.com>
> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1001041905210.11093@localhost.loc aldomain>
> <caa95e271001042316t3b38a27dp4ce9648f46e06a7f@mail .gmail.com>
> <eb4b5e1d1001050417v1defd901sd0b41232a2044b44@mail .gmail.com>
> <4B434346.3010800@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, rosea grammostola wrote:
>
> >> add to that a looping implementation like the one proposed by jesse
> >> chappell years ago, and you're good to go.
> >>
> > Is that proposal of Jesse Chappell online somewhere?
>
> FWIW, I'm trying to search the archives.
>
> Anybody know where I can find Jack-Devel archives between
> 2001 and 2006? The ones at tux.org appear to be... gone.
>
> -gabriel
Are you serious? You need information that is outdated since 4 up to 9
years?
Yesterday I asked Sebastian Moors, if it's thinkable, if there ever
would be Hydrogen as DSSI or LV2.
You are seriously thinking about session handlers and sync to various
applications, instead of doing the same, that is done for Windows since
the stone age?
We need one sequencer + hard disk recorder that is able to include any
other app, thus for Linux it means, that e.g. Ardour, Rosegarden or
Qtractor should be able to be a sequencer and hard disk recorder and
automated mixing console etc. in one and to load e.g. Hydrogen as a DSSI
or LV2 instead of trying to sync and session handle such stuff. Is there
anybody out there to open her/ his brain?
Are you mad?
Why not doing the most simplification?
Explanations are welcome! Maybe I overlooked something

.
Cheers,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users