Linux Archive - Report ot not, Rawhide

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)

- Fedora SELinux Support (http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-selinux-support/)

- - Report ot not, Rawhide (http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-selinux-support/623603-report-ot-not-rawhide.html)

Report ot not, Rawhide

When there are sealerts on Rawhide.
Where the only suggestion is to
either create a mypol, or report as bug.

If I don't know whether to allow or not
Should I bz or c&p here?

--
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

Report ot not, Rawhide

On 23/01/12 14:28, Miroslav Grepl wrote:

This is known bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782907

Sealert works.
But the only suggestion in the reports is to,
either report them as bugs, or create a mypol *
If I am uncertain as to allow access with mypol.
Should I report as bz, os ask here first.

--
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

Report ot not, Rawhide

On 01/21/2012 02:33 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:

When there are sealerts on Rawhide.
Where the only suggestion is to
either create a mypol, or report as bug.

If I don't know whether to allow or not
Should I bz or c&p here?

This is known bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782907
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

Report ot not, Rawhide

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/23/2012 07:36 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 23/01/12 14:28, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
>
>>>
>> This is known bug.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782907
>>
>
> Sealert works. But the only suggestion in the reports is to, either
> report them as bugs, or create a mypol * If I am uncertain as to
> allow access with mypol. Should I report as bz, os ask here first.
>
>
>
If the only solution is to create a mypol, then you should create a
bug also. Then we can analyze if this is something we want to change
in the default policy of can create a bugzilla on the package that
created the AVC.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8deesACgkQrlYvE4MpobMpkQCeJcYzhtKKyS AwQs1Gimd0YYSB
BBIAoJBjQBt1JK94UxlUNWPMTdCnI0ft
=l9Xl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux